Guinea-Bissau vs Namibia: Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score

Guinea-Bissau
2
in 2018
Namibia
2
in 2018
Guinea-Bissau rank
84th
Namibia rank
84th

Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score over time

  • Guinea-Bissau
  • Namibia
00.511.52197419962018

How they compare

Guinea-Bissau currently reports 2 against 2 in Namibia, a difference of 0.

Across all 27 years both countries report, Namibia has been ahead every year.

Guinea-Bissau ranks 84th and Namibia ranks 84th of 166 countries.

Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guinea-Bissau Namibia Difference Ahead
1990s 0.5 2 1.5 Namibia
2000s 1.6 2 0.4 Namibia
2010s 1.56 2 0.4444 Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher competitiveness of executive recruitment score, Guinea-Bissau or Namibia?
Guinea-Bissau, at 2 against 2 in Namibia as of 2018.
What is the difference in competitiveness of executive recruitment score between Guinea-Bissau and Namibia?
0, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Namibia?
27 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2018.
How do Guinea-Bissau and Namibia rank globally for competitiveness of executive recruitment score?
Guinea-Bissau ranks 84th and Namibia ranks 84th of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score
Source
Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
167 places, 17,813 data points, 1789–2020
Last refreshed

Indicates the extent to which executive recruitment is competitive. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over the executive being selected by elites (score of 1), and dual selection-election or transitional arrangements (score of 2), to the executive being elected (score of 4).