How does Lebanon rank for competitiveness of executive recruitment score?

Lebanon ranks 84th out of 166 countries with data for 2018.

Is competitiveness of executive recruitment score rising or falling in Lebanon?

Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.

Where does this Lebanon data come from?

The figures come from Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score in Lebanon

Name: Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score in Lebanon
Creator: Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data
License: CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)

Lebanon: Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score was 2 in 2018. ▬ Flat

Latest (2018)

Change on year

unchanged

World rank

84th

of 166 countries

All-time high

in 1943

All-time low

in 1943

Years of data

1943–2018

Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score in Lebanon, 1943–2018

Source: Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data.

Analysis

In 2018, competitiveness of executive recruitment score in Lebanon stood at 2. That is the highest value across all 46 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over ten years.

Over the whole period, competitiveness of executive recruitment score in Lebanon peaked at 2 in 1943 and was at its lowest, 2, in 1943.

Lebanon ranks 84th of 166 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

Averages by decade

Decade	Average	Lowest	Highest	Years
1940s	2	2	2	7
1950s	2	2	2	10
1960s	2	2	2	10
1970s	2	2	2	5
2000s	2	2	2	5
2010s	2	2	2	9

Countries ranked near Lebanon

See the full ranking of 167 places →

More reference data data for Lebanon

Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Agricultural Soil 423.02 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0413 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0181 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 1.6 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture 437.89 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Burning - Crop re 0.4802 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Crop Residues 26.14 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure left on Pa 251.2 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure Management 14.38 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.3495 (2050)

All data for Lebanon →

Frequently asked questions

What is competitiveness of executive recruitment score in Lebanon?: Competitiveness of executive recruitment score in Lebanon was 2 in 2018, according to Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data.
What is the highest competitiveness of executive recruitment score recorded in Lebanon?: The highest recorded value was 2 in 1943.
What is the lowest competitiveness of executive recruitment score recorded in Lebanon?: The lowest recorded value was 2 in 1943.
How does Lebanon rank for competitiveness of executive recruitment score?: Lebanon ranks 84th out of 166 countries with data for 2018.
Is competitiveness of executive recruitment score rising or falling in Lebanon?: Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Lebanon data come from?: The figures come from Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 46 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).

About this data

Indicator: Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score
Source: Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage: 167 places, 17,813 data points, 1789–2020
Last refreshed: 07 August 2026

Indicates the extent to which executive recruitment is competitive. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over the executive being selected by elites (score of 1), and dual selection-election or transitional arrangements (score of 2), to the executive being elected (score of 4).