Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate in Tanzania
Tanzania: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate was -0.645 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate in Tanzania, 1996–2024
Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
Analysis
The most recent figure for voice and accountability - governance estimate in Tanzania is -0.645 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, measured in 2024.
That represents a change of down 2.8% on the previous year and down 285.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, voice and accountability - governance estimate in Tanzania peaked at 0.0102 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2007 and was at its lowest, -0.9718 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, in 1996.
That places Tanzania 135th out of 207 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate in Tanzania, year by year
| Year | approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1996 | -0.9718 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | — |
| 1998 | -0.8516 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -12.4% |
| 2000 | -0.8547 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.4% |
| 2002 | -0.6656 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -22.1% |
| 2003 | -0.6419 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -3.6% |
| 2004 | -0.4704 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -26.7% |
| 2005 | -0.3133 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -33.4% |
| 2006 | -0.0625 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -80.0% |
| 2007 | 0.0102 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -116.3% |
| 2008 | -0.0613 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -699.8% |
| 2009 | -0.0594 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -3.1% |
| 2010 | -0.0956 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +61.0% |
| 2011 | -0.0644 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -32.6% |
| 2012 | -0.1453 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +125.7% |
| 2013 | -0.181 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +24.6% |
| 2014 | -0.1673 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -7.6% |
| 2015 | -0.1944 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +16.2% |
| 2016 | -0.2802 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +44.2% |
| 2017 | -0.3178 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +13.4% |
| 2018 | -0.428 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +34.7% |
| 2019 | -0.4838 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +13.0% |
| 2020 | -0.5969 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +23.4% |
| 2021 | -0.7099 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +18.9% |
| 2022 | -0.6853 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -3.5% |
| 2023 | -0.6271 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -8.5% |
| 2024 | -0.645 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +2.8% |
Tanzania compared with similar countries
- Tanzania's -0.645 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is above the median for lower middle income countries, which is -0.7733 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, 83% of the median. (47 countries reporting)
- Tanzania's -0.645 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is above the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is -0.9449 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, 68% of the median. (48 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate in Tanzania changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | -699.8% | 0.0102 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.0613 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -0.9117 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.9718 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.8516 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 2 |
| 2000s | -0.3465 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.8547 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0102 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 9 |
| 2010s | -0.2358 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.4838 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.0644 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 10 |
| 2020s | -0.6528 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.7099 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.5969 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 5 |
Countries ranked near Tanzania
More reference data data for Tanzania
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.6405 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 11.44 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 14.14 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.7582 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 14.14 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 2.15 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 1.26 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 59.37 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 72.45 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 4.13 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is voice and accountability - governance estimate in Tanzania?
- Voice and accountability - governance estimate in Tanzania was -0.645 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2024, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest voice and accountability - governance estimate recorded in Tanzania?
- The highest recorded value was 0.0102 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2007.
- What is the lowest voice and accountability - governance estimate recorded in Tanzania?
- The lowest recorded value was -0.9718 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 1996.
- How does Tanzania rank for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
- Tanzania ranks 135th out of 207 countries with data for 2024.
- Is voice and accountability - governance estimate rising or falling in Tanzania?
- Over the last ten years it is down 285.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Tanzania data come from?
- The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 26 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.