Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Rwanda
Rwanda: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) was -0.7616 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025. ▲ Rising
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate in Rwanda, 1996–2025
Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
Analysis
Rwanda recorded -0.7616 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 for voice and accountability - governance estimate in 2025.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 1.9% on the previous year and up 16.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, voice and accountability - governance estimate in Rwanda peaked at -0.7047 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2023 and was at its lowest, -1.78 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, in 1996.
Rwanda ranks 144th of 208 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 27 years of available data.
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Rwanda, year by year
| Year | approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1996 | -1.78 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | — |
| 1998 | -1.65 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -7.4% |
| 2000 | -1.77 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +7.6% |
| 2002 | -1.64 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -7.2% |
| 2003 | -1.43 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -13.2% |
| 2004 | -1.26 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -11.4% |
| 2005 | -1.07 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -15.0% |
| 2006 | -1.03 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -4.6% |
| 2007 | -1.08 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +5.8% |
| 2008 | -1.09 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.1% |
| 2009 | -1.07 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.5% |
| 2010 | -1.14 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +6.5% |
| 2011 | -1.13 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.8% |
| 2012 | -0.9699 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -14.1% |
| 2013 | -0.9723 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.3% |
| 2014 | -0.9059 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -6.8% |
| 2015 | -0.911 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.6% |
| 2016 | -0.929 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +2.0% |
| 2017 | -0.907 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -2.4% |
| 2018 | -0.8615 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -5.0% |
| 2019 | -0.8431 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -2.1% |
| 2020 | -0.8551 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +1.4% |
| 2021 | -0.708 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -17.2% |
| 2022 | -0.71 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.3% |
| 2023 | -0.7047 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.7% |
| 2024 | -0.7476 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +6.1% |
| 2025 | -0.7616 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +1.9% |
Rwanda compared with similar countries
- Rwanda's -0.7616 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is above the median for low income countries, which is -1.25 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, 61% of the median. (25 countries reporting)
- Rwanda's -0.7616 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is above the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is -0.9016 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, 84% of the median. (48 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -1.71 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.78 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.65 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 2 |
| 2000s | -1.27 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.77 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.03 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 9 |
| 2010s | -0.9569 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.14 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.8431 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 10 |
| 2020s | -0.7478 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.8551 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.7047 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Rwanda
More reference data data for Rwanda
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.2282 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.9517 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 1.38 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.1223 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 1.38 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.7651 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.9517 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 4.27 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 6.98 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.666 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is voice and accountability - governance estimate in Rwanda?
- Voice and accountability - governance estimate in Rwanda was -0.7616 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest voice and accountability - governance estimate recorded in Rwanda?
- The highest recorded value was -0.7047 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2023.
- What is the lowest voice and accountability - governance estimate recorded in Rwanda?
- The lowest recorded value was -1.78 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 1996.
- How does Rwanda rank for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
- Rwanda ranks 144th out of 208 countries with data for 2025.
- Is voice and accountability - governance estimate rising or falling in Rwanda?
- Over the last ten years it is up 16.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Rwanda data come from?
- The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 27 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.