Jordan vs Tanzania: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate over time
- Jordan
- Tanzania
How they compare
Tanzania currently reports -0.645 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.7137 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Jordan, a difference of 0.0687 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Jordan ahead.
Jordan ranks 137th and Tanzania ranks 134th of 206 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Jordan averaged higher in 1 and Tanzania in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jordan | Tanzania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -0.6091 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.9117 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.3026 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Jordan |
| 2000s | -0.6069 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.3465 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.2603 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Tanzania |
| 2010s | -0.6437 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.2358 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.4079 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Tanzania |
| 2020s | -0.7232 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.6528 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0703 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Tanzania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Jordan or Tanzania?
- Tanzania, at -0.645 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.7137 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Jordan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Jordan and Tanzania?
- 0.0687 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Tanzania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Tanzania?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
- How do Jordan and Tanzania rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
- Jordan ranks 137th and Tanzania ranks 134th of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.