Iraq vs Tanzania: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) over time
- Iraq
- Tanzania
How they compare
Tanzania currently reports -0.7857 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.8217 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Iraq, a difference of 0.036 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
Across all 27 years both countries report, Tanzania has been ahead every year.
Iraq ranks 146th and Tanzania ranks 145th of 208 countries.
Tanzania has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iraq | Tanzania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -2.01 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.8072 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.21 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Tanzania |
| 2000s | -1.42 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.3217 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.1 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Tanzania |
| 2010s | -0.8999 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.2542 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.6457 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Tanzania |
| 2020s | -0.8687 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.7178 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1509 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Tanzania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Iraq or Tanzania?
- Tanzania, at -0.7857 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.8217 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Iraq as of 2025.
- What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Iraq and Tanzania?
- 0.036 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Tanzania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iraq and Tanzania?
- 27 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2025.
- How do Iraq and Tanzania rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
- Iraq ranks 146th and Tanzania ranks 145th of 208 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.