Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Kyrgyzstan
Kyrgyzstan: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) was -0.8446 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025. ◆ Volatile
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate in Kyrgyzstan, 1996–2025
Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
Analysis
The most recent figure for voice and accountability - governance estimate in Kyrgyzstan is -0.8446 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, measured in 2025.
The figure is down 8.0% on the previous year and down 433.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, voice and accountability - governance estimate in Kyrgyzstan peaked at -0.1443 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2018 and was at its lowest, -1.24 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, in 2000.
That places Kyrgyzstan 148th out of 208 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Kyrgyzstan, year by year
| Year | approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1996 | -0.886 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | — |
| 1998 | -0.9732 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +9.8% |
| 2000 | -1.24 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +27.2% |
| 2002 | -0.9155 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -26.0% |
| 2003 | -0.8977 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.9% |
| 2004 | -0.7754 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -13.6% |
| 2005 | -0.7224 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -6.8% |
| 2006 | -0.4688 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -35.1% |
| 2007 | -0.5468 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +16.6% |
| 2008 | -0.7801 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +42.7% |
| 2009 | -0.7959 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +2.0% |
| 2010 | -0.6045 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -24.1% |
| 2011 | -0.4704 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -22.2% |
| 2012 | -0.4167 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -11.4% |
| 2013 | -0.3118 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -25.2% |
| 2014 | -0.2129 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -31.7% |
| 2015 | -0.1585 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -25.6% |
| 2016 | -0.1779 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +12.2% |
| 2017 | -0.2027 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +13.9% |
| 2018 | -0.1443 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -28.8% |
| 2019 | -0.2639 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +82.9% |
| 2020 | -0.3655 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +38.5% |
| 2021 | -0.4135 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +13.1% |
| 2022 | -0.5921 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +43.2% |
| 2023 | -0.6681 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +12.8% |
| 2024 | -0.782 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +17.1% |
| 2025 | -0.8446 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +8.0% |
Kyrgyzstan compared with similar countries
- Kyrgyzstan's -0.8446 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is below the median for lower middle income countries, which is -0.7209 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, 1.2× the median. (47 countries reporting)
- Kyrgyzstan's -0.8446 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 0.881 approx. -2.5 to +2.5. (54 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -0.9296 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.9732 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.886 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 2 |
| 2000s | -0.7934 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.24 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.4688 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 9 |
| 2010s | -0.2963 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.6045 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.1443 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 10 |
| 2020s | -0.611 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.8446 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.3655 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Kyrgyzstan
More reference data data for Kyrgyzstan
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.2833 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.6193 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 1.24 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0857 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 1.24 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.95 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.8535 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 2.51 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 5.84 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.4667 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is voice and accountability - governance estimate in Kyrgyzstan?
- Voice and accountability - governance estimate in Kyrgyzstan was -0.8446 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest voice and accountability - governance estimate recorded in Kyrgyzstan?
- The highest recorded value was -0.1443 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2018.
- What is the lowest voice and accountability - governance estimate recorded in Kyrgyzstan?
- The lowest recorded value was -1.24 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2000.
- How does Kyrgyzstan rank for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 148th out of 208 countries with data for 2025.
- Is voice and accountability - governance estimate rising or falling in Kyrgyzstan?
- Over the last ten years it is down 433.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Kyrgyzstan data come from?
- The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 27 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.