Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Serbia
Serbia: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) was -0.4145 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025. ◆ Volatile
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate in Serbia, 1996–2025
Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
Analysis
The most recent figure for voice and accountability - governance estimate in Serbia is -0.4145 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, measured in 2025.
That represents a change of down 1.6% on the previous year and down 329.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, voice and accountability - governance estimate in Serbia peaked at 0.3498 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2009 and was at its lowest, -1.28 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, in 1996.
That places Serbia 128th out of 208 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Serbia, year by year
| Year | approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1996 | -1.28 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | — |
| 1998 | -1.11 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -13.8% |
| 2000 | -0.8511 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -23.1% |
| 2002 | -0.2125 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -75.0% |
| 2003 | -0.2335 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +9.9% |
| 2004 | -0.2165 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -7.3% |
| 2005 | -0.1792 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -17.2% |
| 2006 | 0.2569 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -243.3% |
| 2007 | 0.324 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +26.2% |
| 2008 | 0.345 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +6.5% |
| 2009 | 0.3498 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +1.4% |
| 2010 | 0.3284 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -6.1% |
| 2011 | 0.3221 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.9% |
| 2012 | 0.192 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -40.4% |
| 2013 | 0.2039 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +6.2% |
| 2014 | 0.1955 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -4.1% |
| 2015 | 0.1808 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -7.6% |
| 2016 | 0.1606 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -11.1% |
| 2017 | 0.0259 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -83.9% |
| 2018 | -0.1417 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -646.9% |
| 2019 | -0.1123 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -20.8% |
| 2020 | -0.1224 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +9.1% |
| 2021 | -0.1951 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +59.4% |
| 2022 | -0.2186 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +12.0% |
| 2023 | -0.296 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +35.4% |
| 2024 | -0.4081 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +37.9% |
| 2025 | -0.4145 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +1.6% |
Serbia compared with similar countries
- Serbia's -0.4145 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is -0.0542 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, 7.6× the median. (59 countries reporting)
- Serbia's -0.4145 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 0.881 approx. -2.5 to +2.5. (54 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Serbia changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | -646.9% | 0.0259 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.1417 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 |
| 2006 | +243.3% | -0.1792 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.2569 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -1.2 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.28 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.11 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 2 |
| 2000s | -0.0463 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.8511 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.3498 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 9 |
| 2010s | 0.1355 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.1417 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.3284 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 10 |
| 2020s | -0.2758 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.4145 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.1224 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Serbia
More reference data data for Serbia
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.6055 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.3321 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 3.36 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.3467 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 3.36 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 2.03 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 1.29 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.44 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 15.2 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 1.89 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is voice and accountability - governance estimate in Serbia?
- Voice and accountability - governance estimate in Serbia was -0.4145 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest voice and accountability - governance estimate recorded in Serbia?
- The highest recorded value was 0.3498 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2009.
- What is the lowest voice and accountability - governance estimate recorded in Serbia?
- The lowest recorded value was -1.28 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 1996.
- How does Serbia rank for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
- Serbia ranks 128th out of 208 countries with data for 2025.
- Is voice and accountability - governance estimate rising or falling in Serbia?
- Over the last ten years it is down 329.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Serbia data come from?
- The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 27 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.