Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate in Serbia
Serbia: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate was -0.4659 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate in Serbia, 1996–2024
Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
Analysis
The most recent figure for voice and accountability - governance estimate in Serbia is -0.4659 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, measured in 2024.
That represents a change of down 23.9% on the previous year and down 470.8% over ten years.
Over the whole period, voice and accountability - governance estimate in Serbia peaked at 0.3283 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2007 and was at its lowest, -1.38 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, in 1996.
That places Serbia 128th out of 206 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -1.29 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.38 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.19 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 2 |
| 2000s | -0.0857 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.9207 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.3283 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 9 |
| 2010s | 0.0712 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.1848 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.2638 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 10 |
| 2020s | -0.3169 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.4659 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.1972 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 5 |
Countries ranked near Serbia
- 125 Zambia -0.4076 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 126 Maldives -0.4119 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 127 Bolivia -0.4398 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 129 Guatemala -0.4708 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 130 Sierra Leone -0.5129 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 131 Thailand -0.5598 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
More reference data data for Serbia
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.6055 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.3321 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 3.36 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.3467 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 3.36 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 2.03 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 1.29 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.44 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 15.2 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 1.89 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is voice and accountability - governance estimate in Serbia?
- Voice and accountability - governance estimate in Serbia was -0.4659 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2024, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest voice and accountability - governance estimate recorded in Serbia?
- The highest recorded value was 0.3283 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2007.
- What is the lowest voice and accountability - governance estimate recorded in Serbia?
- The lowest recorded value was -1.38 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 1996.
- How does Serbia rank for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
- Serbia ranks 128th out of 206 countries with data for 2024.
- Is voice and accountability - governance estimate rising or falling in Serbia?
- Over the last ten years it is down 470.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Serbia data come from?
- The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 26 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.