Serbia vs Sierra Leone: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate

Serbia
-0.4659 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Sierra Leone
-0.5129 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Serbia rank
128th
Sierra Leone rank
130th

Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate over time

  • Serbia
  • Sierra Leone
-1.5-1-0.500.5199620102024

How they compare

Serbia currently reports -0.4659 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.5129 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Sierra Leone, a difference of 0.047 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Sierra Leone ahead.

Serbia ranks 128th and Sierra Leone ranks 130th of 206 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Serbia averaged higher in 3 and Sierra Leone in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Serbia Sierra Leone Difference Ahead
1990s -1.29 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.9024 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.3844 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Sierra Leone
2000s -0.0857 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.4169 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.3312 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Serbia
2010s 0.0712 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.298 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.3692 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Serbia
2020s -0.3169 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.3672 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0502 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Serbia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Serbia or Sierra Leone?
Serbia, at -0.4659 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.5129 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Sierra Leone as of 2024.
What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Serbia and Sierra Leone?
0.047 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Serbia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Serbia and Sierra Leone?
26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
How do Serbia and Sierra Leone rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
Serbia ranks 128th and Sierra Leone ranks 130th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Serbia vs Sierra Leone: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 25 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/serbia/sierra-leone/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/serbia/sierra-leone/">Serbia vs Sierra Leone: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
206 places, 5,259 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.