Guatemala vs Serbia: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) over time
- Guatemala
- Serbia
How they compare
Guatemala currently reports -0.3367 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.4145 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Serbia, a difference of 0.0778 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Guatemala ahead.
Guatemala ranks 125th and Serbia ranks 128th of 208 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 1 and Serbia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guatemala | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -0.4923 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.2 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.7036 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Guatemala |
| 2000s | -0.2418 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.0463 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1954 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Serbia |
| 2010s | -0.2167 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1355 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.3523 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Serbia |
| 2020s | -0.3769 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.2758 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1011 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Guatemala or Serbia?
- Guatemala, at -0.3367 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.4145 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Serbia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Guatemala and Serbia?
- 0.0778 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Guatemala ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Serbia?
- 27 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2025.
- How do Guatemala and Serbia rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
- Guatemala ranks 125th and Serbia ranks 128th of 208 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.