Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate in Guatemala
Guatemala: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate was -0.4708 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2024. ▲ Rising
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate in Guatemala, 1996–2024
Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
Analysis
The most recent figure for voice and accountability - governance estimate in Guatemala is -0.4708 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, measured in 2024.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 3.9% on the previous year and down 48.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, voice and accountability - governance estimate in Guatemala peaked at -0.0758 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2006 and was at its lowest, -0.6429 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, in 1998.
Guatemala ranks 130th of 207 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 26 years of available data.
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate in Guatemala, year by year
| Year | approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1996 | -0.5356 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | — |
| 1998 | -0.6429 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +20.0% |
| 2000 | -0.596 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -7.3% |
| 2002 | -0.5207 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -12.6% |
| 2003 | -0.5044 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -3.1% |
| 2004 | -0.3091 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -38.7% |
| 2005 | -0.2899 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -6.2% |
| 2006 | -0.0758 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -73.8% |
| 2007 | -0.1225 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +61.6% |
| 2008 | -0.153 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +24.9% |
| 2009 | -0.1793 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +17.2% |
| 2010 | -0.2765 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +54.2% |
| 2011 | -0.3393 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +22.7% |
| 2012 | -0.2918 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -14.0% |
| 2013 | -0.328 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +12.4% |
| 2014 | -0.3166 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -3.5% |
| 2015 | -0.2935 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -7.3% |
| 2016 | -0.2657 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -9.5% |
| 2017 | -0.237 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -10.8% |
| 2018 | -0.3071 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +29.5% |
| 2019 | -0.3397 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +10.6% |
| 2020 | -0.3576 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +5.3% |
| 2021 | -0.4357 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +21.8% |
| 2022 | -0.475 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +9.0% |
| 2023 | -0.4897 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +3.1% |
| 2024 | -0.4708 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -3.9% |
Guatemala compared with similar countries
- Guatemala's -0.4708 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is -0.1051 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, 4.5× the median. (59 countries reporting)
- Guatemala's -0.4708 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is below the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 0.3782 approx. -2.5 to +2.5. (37 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -0.5892 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.6429 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.5356 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 2 |
| 2000s | -0.3056 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.596 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.0758 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 9 |
| 2010s | -0.2995 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.3397 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.237 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 10 |
| 2020s | -0.4457 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.4897 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.3576 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 5 |
Countries ranked near Guatemala
More reference data data for Guatemala
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.9286 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.39 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 3.72 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.1246 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 3.72 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 3.11 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 1.9 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 7.68 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 18.61 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.6786 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is voice and accountability - governance estimate in Guatemala?
- Voice and accountability - governance estimate in Guatemala was -0.4708 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2024, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest voice and accountability - governance estimate recorded in Guatemala?
- The highest recorded value was -0.0758 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2006.
- What is the lowest voice and accountability - governance estimate recorded in Guatemala?
- The lowest recorded value was -0.6429 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 1998.
- How does Guatemala rank for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
- Guatemala ranks 130th out of 207 countries with data for 2024.
- Is voice and accountability - governance estimate rising or falling in Guatemala?
- Over the last ten years it is down 48.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Guatemala data come from?
- The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 26 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.