Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate in Russia
Russia: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate was -1.42 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2024. ▼ Falling
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate in Russia, 1996–2024
Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
Analysis
In 2024, voice and accountability - governance estimate in Russia stood at -1.42 approx. -2.5 to +2.5. That is the lowest value across all 26 years on record.
That represents a change of down 8.5% on the previous year and down 78.8% over ten years.
Over the whole period, voice and accountability - governance estimate in Russia peaked at -0.3969 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2002 and was at its lowest, -1.42 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, in 2024.
Russia ranks 182nd of 206 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 26 years of available data.
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -0.4704 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.535 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.4058 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 2 |
| 2000s | -0.4816 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.5727 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.3969 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 9 |
| 2010s | -0.7685 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.9211 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.5757 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 10 |
| 2020s | -1.16 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.42 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.9044 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 5 |
Countries ranked near Russia
More reference data data for Russia
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 4.94 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture 34,368 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure applied to 8,299 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure Management 5,137 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Burning - Crop re 145.72 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Agricultural Soil 29,086 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure left on Pa 4,811 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 9.34 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 4.11 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Burning - Crop residues 0.5499 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is voice and accountability - governance estimate in Russia?
- Voice and accountability - governance estimate in Russia was -1.42 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2024, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest voice and accountability - governance estimate recorded in Russia?
- The highest recorded value was -0.3969 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2002.
- What is the lowest voice and accountability - governance estimate recorded in Russia?
- The lowest recorded value was -1.42 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2024.
- How does Russia rank for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
- Russia ranks 182nd out of 206 countries with data for 2024.
- Is voice and accountability - governance estimate rising or falling in Russia?
- Over the last ten years it is down 78.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Russia data come from?
- The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 26 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.