Eswatini vs Russian Federation: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate over time
- Eswatini
- Russian Federation
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports -1.35 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -1.42 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Russian Federation, a difference of 0.07 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Russian Federation ahead.
Eswatini ranks 181st and Russian Federation ranks 182nd of 206 countries.
Russian Federation has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Russian Federation | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -1.29 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.4704 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.8155 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Russian Federation |
| 2000s | -1.25 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.4816 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.7698 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Russian Federation |
| 2010s | -1.27 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.7685 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.5011 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Russian Federation |
| 2020s | -1.3 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.16 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1434 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Russian Federation |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Eswatini or Russian Federation?
- Eswatini, at -1.35 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -1.42 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Russian Federation as of 2024.
- What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Eswatini and Russian Federation?
- 0.07 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Russian Federation?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
- How do Eswatini and Russian Federation rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
- Eswatini ranks 181st and Russian Federation ranks 182nd of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.