Chad vs Russia: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)

Chad
-1.45 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Russia
-1.44 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Chad rank
183rd
Russia rank
181st

Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) over time

  • Chad
  • Russia
-1.5-1.2-1-0.75-0.5199620102025

How they compare

Russia currently reports -1.44 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -1.45 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Chad, a difference of 0.01 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Russia ahead.

Chad ranks 183rd and Russia ranks 181st of 208 countries.

Russia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chad Russia Difference Ahead
1990s -1.23 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.6456 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.5813 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Russia
2000s -1.23 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.5152 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.7153 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Russia
2010s -1.22 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.7566 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.465 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Russia
2020s -1.44 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -1.24 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1982 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Russia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Chad or Russia?
Russia, at -1.44 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -1.45 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Chad as of 2025.
What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Chad and Russia?
0.01 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Russia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Russia?
27 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2025.
How do Chad and Russia rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
Chad ranks 183rd and Russia ranks 181st of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chad vs Russia: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/chad/russian-federation/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/chad/russian-federation/">Chad vs Russia: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
208 places, 5,514 data points, 1996–2025
Last refreshed

Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.