Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate in Djibouti

Djibouti: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate was -1.25 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2024. ▼ Falling

Latest (2024)
-1.25 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Change on year
down 1.7%
World rank
172nd
of 206 countries
All-time high
-0.722 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2003
All-time low
-1.37 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2013
Years of data
26
1996–2024

Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate in Djibouti, 1996–2024

-1.4-1.2-1-0.81996201020241996: -1 approx. -2.5 to +2.51998: -1.1 approx. -2.5 to +2.52000: -1 approx. -2.5 to +2.52002: -0.883 approx. -2.5 to +2.52003: -0.722 approx. -2.5 to +2.52004: -0.8 approx. -2.5 to +2.52005: -1 approx. -2.5 to +2.52006: -0.971 approx. -2.5 to +2.52007: -1.1 approx. -2.5 to +2.52008: -1.1 approx. -2.5 to +2.52009: -1.1 approx. -2.5 to +2.52010: -1.1 approx. -2.5 to +2.52011: -1.2 approx. -2.5 to +2.52012: -1.3 approx. -2.5 to +2.52013: -1.4 approx. -2.5 to +2.52014: -1.3 approx. -2.5 to +2.52015: -1.3 approx. -2.5 to +2.52016: -1.3 approx. -2.5 to +2.52017: -1.3 approx. -2.5 to +2.52018: -1.2 approx. -2.5 to +2.52019: -1.3 approx. -2.5 to +2.52020: -1.2 approx. -2.5 to +2.52021: -1.2 approx. -2.5 to +2.52022: -1.2 approx. -2.5 to +2.52023: -1.2 approx. -2.5 to +2.52024: -1.2 approx. -2.5 to +2.5

Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

Analysis

In 2024, voice and accountability - governance estimate in Djibouti stood at -1.25 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

Compared with earlier readings it is down 1.7% on the previous year and up 7.6% over ten years.

Over the whole period, voice and accountability - governance estimate in Djibouti peaked at -0.722 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2003 and was at its lowest, -1.37 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, in 2013.

Djibouti ranks 172nd of 206 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.

The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 26 years of available data.

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1990s -1.09 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -1.15 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -1.04 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 2
2000s -0.9544 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -1.08 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.722 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 9
2010s -1.26 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -1.37 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -1.08 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 10
2020s -1.21 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -1.25 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -1.19 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 5

Countries ranked near Djibouti

  1. 169 Comoros -1.24 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
  2. 170 Cameroon -1.24 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
  3. 171 Ethiopia -1.24 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
  4. 173 Zimbabwe -1.26 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
  5. 174 Haiti -1.26 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
  6. 175 Cuba -1.27 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare

See the full ranking of 206 places →

More reference data data for Djibouti

All data for Djibouti →

Frequently asked questions

What is voice and accountability - governance estimate in Djibouti?
Voice and accountability - governance estimate in Djibouti was -1.25 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2024, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
What is the highest voice and accountability - governance estimate recorded in Djibouti?
The highest recorded value was -0.722 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2003.
What is the lowest voice and accountability - governance estimate recorded in Djibouti?
The lowest recorded value was -1.37 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2013.
How does Djibouti rank for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
Djibouti ranks 172nd out of 206 countries with data for 2024.
Is voice and accountability - governance estimate rising or falling in Djibouti?
Over the last ten years it is up 7.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
Where does this Djibouti data come from?
The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 26 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate in Djibouti. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 19 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/djibouti/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/djibouti/">Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate in Djibouti</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
206 places, 5,259 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.