Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate in Libya
Libya: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate was -1.34 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2024. ▲ Rising
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate in Libya, 1996–2024
Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
Analysis
The most recent figure for voice and accountability - governance estimate in Libya is -1.34 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, measured in 2024.
The figure is up 1.6% on the previous year and down 24.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, voice and accountability - governance estimate in Libya peaked at -0.8116 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2013 and was at its lowest, -1.91 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, in 2004.
That places Libya 180th out of 207 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 26 years of available data.
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate in Libya, year by year
| Year | approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1996 | -1.77 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | — |
| 1998 | -1.86 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +4.8% |
| 2000 | -1.86 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.0% |
| 2002 | -1.89 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +1.8% |
| 2003 | -1.86 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.7% |
| 2004 | -1.91 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +2.5% |
| 2005 | -1.86 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -2.5% |
| 2006 | -1.77 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -4.9% |
| 2007 | -1.77 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.1% |
| 2008 | -1.77 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.2% |
| 2009 | -1.76 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.4% |
| 2010 | -1.83 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +3.5% |
| 2011 | -1.52 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -16.5% |
| 2012 | -0.8509 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -44.2% |
| 2013 | -0.8116 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -4.6% |
| 2014 | -1.08 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +32.5% |
| 2015 | -1.17 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +8.4% |
| 2016 | -1.2 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +2.9% |
| 2017 | -1.23 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +2.7% |
| 2018 | -1.19 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -3.6% |
| 2019 | -1.11 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -6.7% |
| 2020 | -1.11 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.5% |
| 2021 | -1.27 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +13.8% |
| 2022 | -1.32 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +3.8% |
| 2023 | -1.36 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +3.1% |
| 2024 | -1.34 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.6% |
Libya compared with similar countries
- Libya's -1.34 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is -0.1051 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, 12.7× the median. (59 countries reporting)
- Libya's -1.34 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is below the median for Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan, which is -1.05 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, 1.3× the median. (23 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate in Libya changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 | +44.2% | -1.52 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.8509 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 |
| 2014 | -32.5% | -0.8116 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.08 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -1.82 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.86 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.77 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 2 |
| 2000s | -1.83 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.91 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.76 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 9 |
| 2010s | -1.2 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.83 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.8116 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 10 |
| 2020s | -1.28 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.36 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.11 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 5 |
Countries ranked near Libya
More reference data data for Libya
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0637 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.56 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 2.03 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.021 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 2.03 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.2136 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.0873 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 5.82 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 7.82 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.1144 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is voice and accountability - governance estimate in Libya?
- Voice and accountability - governance estimate in Libya was -1.34 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2024, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest voice and accountability - governance estimate recorded in Libya?
- The highest recorded value was -0.8116 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2013.
- What is the lowest voice and accountability - governance estimate recorded in Libya?
- The lowest recorded value was -1.91 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2004.
- How does Libya rank for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
- Libya ranks 180th out of 207 countries with data for 2024.
- Is voice and accountability - governance estimate rising or falling in Libya?
- Over the last ten years it is down 24.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Libya data come from?
- The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 26 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.