Cayman Islands vs Latvia: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)

Cayman Islands
1.11 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Latvia
1.12 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Cayman Islands rank
29th
Latvia rank
27th

Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) over time

  • Cayman Islands
  • Latvia
0.40.60.811.21.4199620102025

How they compare

Latvia currently reports 1.12 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 1.11 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Cayman Islands, a difference of 0.01 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Cayman Islands ahead.

Cayman Islands ranks 29th and Latvia ranks 27th of 208 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Cayman Islands averaged higher in 2 and Latvia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cayman Islands Latvia Difference Ahead
1990s 1.41 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.6082 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.8051 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Cayman Islands
2000s 0.8985 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.6503 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.2482 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Cayman Islands
2010s 0.6339 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.7242 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0903 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Latvia
2020s 0.8118 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 1.04 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.2299 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Latvia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Cayman Islands or Latvia?
Latvia, at 1.12 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 1.11 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Cayman Islands as of 2025.
What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Cayman Islands and Latvia?
0.01 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Latvia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cayman Islands and Latvia?
27 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2025.
How do Cayman Islands and Latvia rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
Cayman Islands ranks 29th and Latvia ranks 27th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cayman Islands vs Latvia: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/cayman-islands/latvia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/cayman-islands/latvia/">Cayman Islands vs Latvia: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
208 places, 5,514 data points, 1996–2025
Last refreshed

Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.