Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Kiribati
Kiribati: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) was 1.03 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025. ▲ Rising
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate in Kiribati, 1996–2025
Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
Analysis
Kiribati recorded 1.03 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 for voice and accountability - governance estimate in 2025.
The figure is down 0.2% on the previous year and up 44.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, voice and accountability - governance estimate in Kiribati peaked at 1.17 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 1998 and was at its lowest, 0.3152 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, in 2009.
That places Kiribati 39th out of 208 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the top quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 27 years of available data.
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Kiribati, year by year
| Year | approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1996 | 1.16 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | — |
| 1998 | 1.17 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.6% |
| 2000 | 1.12 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -3.7% |
| 2002 | 0.9404 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -16.3% |
| 2003 | 0.8746 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -7.0% |
| 2004 | 0.628 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -28.2% |
| 2005 | 0.4399 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -29.9% |
| 2006 | 0.4832 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +9.8% |
| 2007 | 0.3702 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -23.4% |
| 2008 | 0.335 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -9.5% |
| 2009 | 0.3152 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -5.9% |
| 2010 | 0.3562 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +13.0% |
| 2011 | 0.713 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +100.2% |
| 2012 | 0.726 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +1.8% |
| 2013 | 0.7172 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.2% |
| 2014 | 0.7191 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.3% |
| 2015 | 0.716 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.4% |
| 2016 | 0.7208 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.7% |
| 2017 | 0.7287 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +1.1% |
| 2018 | 0.9262 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +27.1% |
| 2019 | 0.9947 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +7.4% |
| 2020 | 0.9873 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.7% |
| 2021 | 1.05 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +6.3% |
| 2022 | 1.05 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.1% |
| 2023 | 1.05 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.1% |
| 2024 | 1.04 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.0% |
| 2025 | 1.03 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.2% |
Kiribati compared with similar countries
- Kiribati's 1.03 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is above the median for lower middle income countries, which is -0.7209 approx. -2.5 to +2.5. (47 countries reporting)
- Kiribati's 1.03 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is above the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 0.334 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, 3.1× the median. (36 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Kiribati changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | +100.2% | 0.3562 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.713 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.16 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.16 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.17 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 2 |
| 2000s | 0.6122 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.3152 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.12 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 9 |
| 2010s | 0.7318 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.3562 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.9947 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 10 |
| 2020s | 1.03 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.9873 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.05 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Kiribati
More reference data data for Kiribati
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0058 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.0001 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.0059 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.0059 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0194 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.0086 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.0008 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.0288 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.0202 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure applied 5.13 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is voice and accountability - governance estimate in Kiribati?
- Voice and accountability - governance estimate in Kiribati was 1.03 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest voice and accountability - governance estimate recorded in Kiribati?
- The highest recorded value was 1.17 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 1998.
- What is the lowest voice and accountability - governance estimate recorded in Kiribati?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.3152 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2009.
- How does Kiribati rank for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
- Kiribati ranks 39th out of 208 countries with data for 2025.
- Is voice and accountability - governance estimate rising or falling in Kiribati?
- Over the last ten years it is up 44.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Kiribati data come from?
- The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 27 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.