Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Chile
Chile: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) was 1.04 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025. ▬ Flat
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate in Chile, 1996–2025
Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
Analysis
The most recent figure for voice and accountability - governance estimate in Chile is 1.04 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, measured in 2025.
That represents a change of up 1.8% on the previous year and down 4.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, voice and accountability - governance estimate in Chile peaked at 1.29 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2007 and was at its lowest, 0.622 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, in 1998.
That places Chile 38th out of 208 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the top quarter.
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Chile, year by year
| Year | approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1996 | 0.79 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | — |
| 1998 | 0.622 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -21.3% |
| 2000 | 0.8603 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +38.3% |
| 2002 | 1.2 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +39.2% |
| 2003 | 1.15 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -3.7% |
| 2004 | 1.14 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.3% |
| 2005 | 1.28 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +12.6% |
| 2006 | 1.28 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 1.29 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.9% |
| 2008 | 1.18 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -8.6% |
| 2009 | 1.21 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +2.3% |
| 2010 | 1.18 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -2.4% |
| 2011 | 1.1 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -6.3% |
| 2012 | 1.09 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.4% |
| 2013 | 1.1 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.7% |
| 2014 | 1.11 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.9% |
| 2015 | 1.08 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -2.2% |
| 2016 | 1.09 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.6% |
| 2017 | 1.08 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.6% |
| 2018 | 1.08 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.3% |
| 2019 | 1.03 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -4.7% |
| 2020 | 1.04 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +1.4% |
| 2021 | 0.9991 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -4.2% |
| 2022 | 1.02 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +2.0% |
| 2023 | 1.04 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +1.6% |
| 2024 | 1.02 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.8% |
| 2025 | 1.04 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +1.8% |
Chile compared with similar countries
- Chile's 1.04 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is above the median for high income countries, which is 1.02 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, 1.0× the median. (76 countries reporting)
- Chile's 1.04 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is above the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 0.4224 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, 2.5× the median. (37 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Chile changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2002 | +39.2% | 0.8603 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.2 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 |
| 2000 | +38.3% | 0.622 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.8603 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.706 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.622 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.79 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 2 |
| 2000s | 1.18 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.8603 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.29 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 9 |
| 2010s | 1.09 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.03 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.18 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 10 |
| 2020s | 1.02 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.9991 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.04 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Chile
More reference data data for Chile
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.9268 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 2.22 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 5.33 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.2204 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 5.33 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 3.11 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 1.46 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 11.45 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 25.25 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 1.2 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is voice and accountability - governance estimate in Chile?
- Voice and accountability - governance estimate in Chile was 1.04 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest voice and accountability - governance estimate recorded in Chile?
- The highest recorded value was 1.29 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2007.
- What is the lowest voice and accountability - governance estimate recorded in Chile?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.622 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 1998.
- How does Chile rank for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
- Chile ranks 38th out of 208 countries with data for 2025.
- Is voice and accountability - governance estimate rising or falling in Chile?
- Over the last ten years it is down 4.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Chile data come from?
- The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 27 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.