Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Costa Rica
Costa Rica: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) was 1.04 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025. ▲ Rising
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate in Costa Rica, 1996–2025
Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
Analysis
The most recent figure for voice and accountability - governance estimate in Costa Rica is 1.04 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, measured in 2025.
That represents a change of up 3.0% on the previous year and down 8.8% over ten years.
Over the whole period, voice and accountability - governance estimate in Costa Rica peaked at 1.18 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2020 and was at its lowest, 1 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, in 2005.
That places Costa Rica 37th out of 208 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the top quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 27 years of available data.
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Costa Rica, year by year
| Year | approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1996 | 1.04 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | — |
| 1998 | 1.05 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.7% |
| 2000 | 1.03 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -2.1% |
| 2002 | 1.14 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +11.0% |
| 2003 | 1.1 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -3.8% |
| 2004 | 1.02 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -6.7% |
| 2005 | 1 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -2.0% |
| 2006 | 1.03 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +2.4% |
| 2007 | 1.03 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.5% |
| 2008 | 1.02 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.3% |
| 2009 | 1.05 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +3.1% |
| 2010 | 1.09 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +4.1% |
| 2011 | 1.09 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.4% |
| 2012 | 1.09 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.3% |
| 2013 | 1.08 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.6% |
| 2014 | 1.12 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +4.1% |
| 2015 | 1.14 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +1.4% |
| 2016 | 1.12 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.7% |
| 2017 | 1.15 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +2.7% |
| 2018 | 1.17 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +2.2% |
| 2019 | 1.17 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.3% |
| 2020 | 1.18 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +1.2% |
| 2021 | 1.14 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -3.6% |
| 2022 | 1.12 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -2.0% |
| 2023 | 1.11 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.2% |
| 2024 | 1.01 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -9.0% |
| 2025 | 1.04 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +3.0% |
Costa Rica compared with similar countries
- Costa Rica's 1.04 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is above the median for high income countries, which is 1.02 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, 1.0× the median. (76 countries reporting)
- Costa Rica's 1.04 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is above the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 0.4224 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, 2.5× the median. (37 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.05 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.04 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.05 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 2 |
| 2000s | 1.05 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.14 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 9 |
| 2010s | 1.12 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.08 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.17 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 10 |
| 2020s | 1.1 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.01 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.18 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Costa Rica
More reference data data for Costa Rica
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.2987 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.406 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 1.27 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0167 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 1.27 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.3161 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 2.24 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 5.91 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0907 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is voice and accountability - governance estimate in Costa Rica?
- Voice and accountability - governance estimate in Costa Rica was 1.04 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest voice and accountability - governance estimate recorded in Costa Rica?
- The highest recorded value was 1.18 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2020.
- What is the lowest voice and accountability - governance estimate recorded in Costa Rica?
- The lowest recorded value was 1 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2005.
- How does Costa Rica rank for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
- Costa Rica ranks 37th out of 208 countries with data for 2025.
- Is voice and accountability - governance estimate rising or falling in Costa Rica?
- Over the last ten years it is down 8.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Costa Rica data come from?
- The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 27 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.