Bermuda vs Kiribati: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) over time
- Bermuda
- Kiribati
How they compare
Kiribati currently reports 1.03 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 1.03 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Bermuda, a difference of 0 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 19 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Kiribati ahead.
Bermuda ranks 40th and Kiribati ranks 39th of 208 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Bermuda averaged higher in 2 and Kiribati in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bermuda | Kiribati | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.9784 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.16 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.185 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Kiribati |
| 2000s | 0.9609 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.6122 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.3486 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Bermuda |
| 2010s | 1.03 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.6746 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.3551 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Bermuda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Bermuda or Kiribati?
- Kiribati, at 1.03 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 1.03 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Bermuda as of 2025.
- What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Bermuda and Kiribati?
- 0 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Kiribati ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bermuda and Kiribati?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2017.
- How do Bermuda and Kiribati rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
- Bermuda ranks 40th and Kiribati ranks 39th of 208 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.