Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Ecuador
Ecuador: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) was -0.0803 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025. ◆ Volatile
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate in Ecuador, 1996–2025
Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
Analysis
The most recent figure for voice and accountability - governance estimate in Ecuador is -0.0803 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, measured in 2025.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 620.3% on the previous year and up 74.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, voice and accountability - governance estimate in Ecuador peaked at 0.0317 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2021 and was at its lowest, -0.3134 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, in 2015.
Ecuador ranks 109th of 208 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Ecuador, year by year
| Year | approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1996 | -0.1206 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | — |
| 1998 | -0.0634 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -47.4% |
| 2000 | -0.2963 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +367.4% |
| 2002 | -0.0637 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -78.5% |
| 2003 | -0.0274 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -57.0% |
| 2004 | -0.0856 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +211.9% |
| 2005 | -0.0814 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -4.9% |
| 2006 | -0.0739 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -9.2% |
| 2007 | 0.0063 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -108.6% |
| 2008 | -0.0357 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -664.3% |
| 2009 | -0.0379 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +6.2% |
| 2010 | -0.0793 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +109.0% |
| 2011 | -0.1069 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +34.9% |
| 2012 | -0.2316 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +116.6% |
| 2013 | -0.2481 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +7.2% |
| 2014 | -0.2404 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -3.1% |
| 2015 | -0.3134 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +30.3% |
| 2016 | -0.2898 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -7.5% |
| 2017 | -0.2342 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -19.2% |
| 2018 | -0.0298 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -87.3% |
| 2019 | -0.0305 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +2.2% |
| 2020 | -0.0366 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +20.1% |
| 2021 | 0.0317 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -186.7% |
| 2022 | 0.0269 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -15.2% |
| 2023 | -0.0176 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -165.2% |
| 2024 | -0.0111 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -36.5% |
| 2025 | -0.0803 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +620.3% |
Ecuador compared with similar countries
- Ecuador's -0.0803 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is -0.0542 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, 1.5× the median. (59 countries reporting)
- Ecuador's -0.0803 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is below the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 0.4224 approx. -2.5 to +2.5. (37 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Ecuador changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | -664.3% | 0.0063 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.0357 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 |
| 2025 | -620.3% | -0.0111 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.0803 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -0.092 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.1206 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.0634 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 2 |
| 2000s | -0.0773 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.2963 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0063 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 9 |
| 2010s | -0.1804 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.3134 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.0298 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 10 |
| 2020s | -0.0145 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.0803 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0317 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Ecuador
More reference data data for Ecuador
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.9379 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 2.51 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 4.74 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.1826 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 4.74 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 3.14 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 1.18 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 13.63 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 23.57 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.9943 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is voice and accountability - governance estimate in Ecuador?
- Voice and accountability - governance estimate in Ecuador was -0.0803 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest voice and accountability - governance estimate recorded in Ecuador?
- The highest recorded value was 0.0317 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2021.
- What is the lowest voice and accountability - governance estimate recorded in Ecuador?
- The lowest recorded value was -0.3134 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2015.
- How does Ecuador rank for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
- Ecuador ranks 109th out of 208 countries with data for 2025.
- Is voice and accountability - governance estimate rising or falling in Ecuador?
- Over the last ten years it is up 74.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Ecuador data come from?
- The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 27 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.