Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate in Ecuador
Ecuador: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate was -0.1051 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate in Ecuador, 1996–2024
Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
Analysis
The most recent figure for voice and accountability - governance estimate in Ecuador is -0.1051 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, measured in 2024.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 15.3% on the previous year and up 66.8% over ten years.
Over the whole period, voice and accountability - governance estimate in Ecuador peaked at -0.0517 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2007 and was at its lowest, -0.4062 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, in 2015.
Ecuador ranks 107th of 207 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate in Ecuador, year by year
| Year | approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1996 | -0.1631 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | — |
| 1998 | -0.1103 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -32.4% |
| 2000 | -0.3498 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +217.0% |
| 2002 | -0.1439 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -58.9% |
| 2003 | -0.109 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -24.3% |
| 2004 | -0.1413 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +29.6% |
| 2005 | -0.1618 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +14.5% |
| 2006 | -0.1342 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -17.0% |
| 2007 | -0.0517 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -61.5% |
| 2008 | -0.1418 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +174.4% |
| 2009 | -0.1332 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -6.1% |
| 2010 | -0.1711 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +28.5% |
| 2011 | -0.1833 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +7.1% |
| 2012 | -0.3397 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +85.4% |
| 2013 | -0.3577 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +5.3% |
| 2014 | -0.3171 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -11.4% |
| 2015 | -0.4062 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +28.1% |
| 2016 | -0.3717 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -8.5% |
| 2017 | -0.3262 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -12.2% |
| 2018 | -0.1611 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -50.6% |
| 2019 | -0.1418 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -12.0% |
| 2020 | -0.1591 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +12.2% |
| 2021 | -0.0754 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -52.6% |
| 2022 | -0.0898 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +19.2% |
| 2023 | -0.1242 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +38.2% |
| 2024 | -0.1051 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -15.3% |
Ecuador compared with similar countries
- Ecuador's -0.1051 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is -0.1051 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, 1.0× the median. (59 countries reporting)
- Ecuador's -0.1051 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is below the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 0.3782 approx. -2.5 to +2.5. (37 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -0.1367 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.1631 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.1103 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 2 |
| 2000s | -0.1519 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.3498 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.0517 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 9 |
| 2010s | -0.2776 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.4062 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.1418 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 10 |
| 2020s | -0.1107 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.1591 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.0754 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 5 |
Countries ranked near Ecuador
More reference data data for Ecuador
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.9379 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 2.51 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 4.74 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.1826 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 4.74 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 3.14 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 1.18 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 13.63 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 23.57 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.9943 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is voice and accountability - governance estimate in Ecuador?
- Voice and accountability - governance estimate in Ecuador was -0.1051 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2024, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest voice and accountability - governance estimate recorded in Ecuador?
- The highest recorded value was -0.0517 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2007.
- What is the lowest voice and accountability - governance estimate recorded in Ecuador?
- The lowest recorded value was -0.4062 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2015.
- How does Ecuador rank for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
- Ecuador ranks 107th out of 207 countries with data for 2024.
- Is voice and accountability - governance estimate rising or falling in Ecuador?
- Over the last ten years it is up 66.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Ecuador data come from?
- The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 26 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.