Ecuador vs Hungary: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) over time
- Ecuador
- Hungary
How they compare
Hungary currently reports -0.0357 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.0803 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Ecuador, a difference of 0.0446 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
Across all 27 years both countries report, Hungary has been ahead every year.
Ecuador ranks 109th and Hungary ranks 107th of 208 countries.
Hungary has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Hungary | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -0.092 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.8796 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.9716 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Hungary |
| 2000s | -0.0773 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.02 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.1 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Hungary |
| 2010s | -0.1804 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.5077 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.6881 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Hungary |
| 2020s | -0.0145 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0688 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0833 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Hungary |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Ecuador or Hungary?
- Hungary, at -0.0357 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.0803 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Ecuador as of 2025.
- What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Ecuador and Hungary?
- 0.0446 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Hungary ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Hungary?
- 27 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2025.
- How do Ecuador and Hungary rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
- Ecuador ranks 109th and Hungary ranks 107th of 208 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.