Ecuador vs Paraguay: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)

Ecuador
-0.0803 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Paraguay
-0.1354 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Ecuador rank
109th
Paraguay rank
112th

Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) over time

  • Ecuador
  • Paraguay
-0.6-0.4-0.2-0199620102025

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports -0.0803 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.1354 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Paraguay, a difference of 0.0551 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Ecuador ahead.

Ecuador ranks 109th and Paraguay ranks 112th of 208 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 3 and Paraguay in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Paraguay Difference Ahead
1990s -0.092 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.3191 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.2271 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Ecuador
2000s -0.0773 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.2357 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1584 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Ecuador
2010s -0.1804 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.0206 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1598 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Paraguay
2020s -0.0145 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.0763 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0618 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Ecuador or Paraguay?
Ecuador, at -0.0803 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.1354 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Paraguay as of 2025.
What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Ecuador and Paraguay?
0.0551 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Paraguay?
27 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2025.
How do Ecuador and Paraguay rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
Ecuador ranks 109th and Paraguay ranks 112th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Paraguay: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 14 November 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/ecuador/paraguay/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/ecuador/paraguay/">Ecuador vs Paraguay: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
208 places, 5,514 data points, 1996–2025
Last refreshed

Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.