Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Malawi
Malawi: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) was -0.0087 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025. ◆ Volatile
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate in Malawi, 1996–2025
Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
Analysis
The most recent figure for voice and accountability - governance estimate in Malawi is -0.0087 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, measured in 2025.
That represents a change of up 43.8% on the previous year and up 86.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, voice and accountability - governance estimate in Malawi peaked at 0.0066 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2023 and was at its lowest, -0.7002 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, in 2002.
Malawi ranks 106th of 208 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Malawi, year by year
| Year | approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1996 | -0.2416 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | — |
| 1998 | -0.1771 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -26.7% |
| 2000 | -0.3668 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +107.1% |
| 2002 | -0.7002 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +90.9% |
| 2003 | -0.6597 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -5.8% |
| 2004 | -0.5103 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -22.6% |
| 2005 | -0.3113 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -39.0% |
| 2006 | -0.1305 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -58.1% |
| 2007 | -0.0781 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -40.1% |
| 2008 | -0.1238 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +58.5% |
| 2009 | -0.0548 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -55.7% |
| 2010 | -0.1972 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +259.7% |
| 2011 | -0.2602 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +32.0% |
| 2012 | -0.106 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -59.3% |
| 2013 | -0.1073 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +1.1% |
| 2014 | -0.0747 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -30.3% |
| 2015 | -0.0649 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -13.1% |
| 2016 | -0.1364 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +110.0% |
| 2017 | -0.1366 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.2% |
| 2018 | -0.1326 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -2.9% |
| 2019 | -0.1923 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +45.0% |
| 2020 | -0.0078 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -96.0% |
| 2021 | -0.0086 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +10.7% |
| 2022 | -0.0017 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -80.6% |
| 2023 | 0.0066 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -496.6% |
| 2024 | -0.0155 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -334.4% |
| 2025 | -0.0087 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -43.8% |
Malawi compared with similar countries
- Malawi's -0.0087 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is above the median for low income countries, which is -1.25 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, 1% of the median. (25 countries reporting)
- Malawi's -0.0087 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is above the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is -0.9016 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, 1% of the median. (48 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Malawi changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | +496.6% | -0.0017 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0066 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -0.2094 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.2416 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.1771 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 2 |
| 2000s | -0.3262 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.7002 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.0548 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 9 |
| 2010s | -0.1408 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.2602 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.0649 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 10 |
| 2020s | -0.0059 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.0155 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0066 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Malawi
More reference data data for Malawi
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.1596 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.09 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 3.71 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.3426 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 3.71 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.5353 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.6012 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 4.92 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 16.7 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 1.87 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is voice and accountability - governance estimate in Malawi?
- Voice and accountability - governance estimate in Malawi was -0.0087 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest voice and accountability - governance estimate recorded in Malawi?
- The highest recorded value was 0.0066 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2023.
- What is the lowest voice and accountability - governance estimate recorded in Malawi?
- The lowest recorded value was -0.7002 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2002.
- How does Malawi rank for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
- Malawi ranks 106th out of 208 countries with data for 2025.
- Is voice and accountability - governance estimate rising or falling in Malawi?
- Over the last ten years it is up 86.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Malawi data come from?
- The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 27 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.