Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate in Malawi
Malawi: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate was -0.1094 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate in Malawi, 1996–2024
Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
Analysis
The most recent figure for voice and accountability - governance estimate in Malawi is -0.1094 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, measured in 2024.
That represents a change of down 53.1% on the previous year and up 32.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, voice and accountability - governance estimate in Malawi peaked at -0.0715 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2023 and was at its lowest, -0.6993 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, in 2002.
Malawi ranks 109th of 207 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate in Malawi, year by year
| Year | approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1996 | -0.1898 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | — |
| 1998 | -0.1212 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -36.2% |
| 2000 | -0.3332 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +175.0% |
| 2002 | -0.6993 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +109.9% |
| 2003 | -0.6313 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -9.7% |
| 2004 | -0.5114 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -19.0% |
| 2005 | -0.3467 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -32.2% |
| 2006 | -0.2102 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -39.4% |
| 2007 | -0.1571 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -25.3% |
| 2008 | -0.1892 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +20.5% |
| 2009 | -0.099 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -47.7% |
| 2010 | -0.2712 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +173.8% |
| 2011 | -0.325 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +19.9% |
| 2012 | -0.2319 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -28.6% |
| 2013 | -0.2412 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +4.0% |
| 2014 | -0.1612 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -33.2% |
| 2015 | -0.1424 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -11.7% |
| 2016 | -0.1932 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +35.7% |
| 2017 | -0.2176 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +12.6% |
| 2018 | -0.2241 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +3.0% |
| 2019 | -0.2729 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +21.8% |
| 2020 | -0.0852 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -68.8% |
| 2021 | -0.0757 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -11.1% |
| 2022 | -0.0793 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +4.8% |
| 2023 | -0.0715 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -9.9% |
| 2024 | -0.1094 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +53.1% |
Malawi compared with similar countries
- Malawi's -0.1094 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is above the median for low income countries, which is -1.22 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, 9% of the median. (25 countries reporting)
- Malawi's -0.1094 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is above the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is -0.9449 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, 12% of the median. (48 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -0.1555 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.1898 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.1212 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 2 |
| 2000s | -0.353 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.6993 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.099 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 9 |
| 2010s | -0.2281 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.325 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.1424 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 10 |
| 2020s | -0.0842 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.1094 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.0715 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 5 |
Countries ranked near Malawi
More reference data data for Malawi
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.1596 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.09 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 3.71 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.3426 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 3.71 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.5353 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.6012 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 4.92 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 16.7 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 1.87 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is voice and accountability - governance estimate in Malawi?
- Voice and accountability - governance estimate in Malawi was -0.1094 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2024, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest voice and accountability - governance estimate recorded in Malawi?
- The highest recorded value was -0.0715 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2023.
- What is the lowest voice and accountability - governance estimate recorded in Malawi?
- The lowest recorded value was -0.6993 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2002.
- How does Malawi rank for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
- Malawi ranks 109th out of 207 countries with data for 2024.
- Is voice and accountability - governance estimate rising or falling in Malawi?
- Over the last ten years it is up 32.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Malawi data come from?
- The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 26 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.