Madagascar vs Mauritania: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 met
Madagascar
78.93
in 2014
Mauritania
79.5
in 2014
Madagascar rank
108th
Mauritania rank
107th
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 met over time
- Madagascar
- Mauritania
How they compare
Mauritania currently reports 79.5 against 78.93 in Madagascar, a difference of 0.57.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Mauritania has been ahead every year.
Madagascar ranks 108th and Mauritania ranks 107th of 181 countries.
Mauritania has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Madagascar | Mauritania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 61 | 74.19 | 13.19 | Mauritania |
| 2010s | 74.38 | 78.46 | 4.08 | Mauritania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met, Madagascar or Mauritania?
- Mauritania, at 79.5 against 78.93 in Madagascar as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met between Madagascar and Mauritania?
- 0.57, with Mauritania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Madagascar and Mauritania?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Madagascar and Mauritania rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met?
- Madagascar ranks 108th and Mauritania ranks 107th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.