Bangladesh vs Mauritania: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15)
Bangladesh
79.64
in 2014
Mauritania
79.5
in 2014
Bangladesh rank
105th
Mauritania rank
108th
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15) over time
- Bangladesh
- Mauritania
How they compare
Bangladesh currently reports 79.64 against 79.5 in Mauritania, a difference of 0.14.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Mauritania ahead.
Bangladesh ranks 105th and Mauritania ranks 108th of 183 countries.
Mauritania has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bangladesh | Mauritania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 70.21 | 74.19 | 3.98 | Mauritania |
| 2010s | 77.66 | 78.46 | 0.8032 | Mauritania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15), Bangladesh or Mauritania?
- Bangladesh, at 79.64 against 79.5 in Mauritania as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) between Bangladesh and Mauritania?
- 0.14, with Bangladesh ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Mauritania?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Bangladesh and Mauritania rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15)?
- Bangladesh ranks 105th and Mauritania ranks 108th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.