Is trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16 rising or falling in Kuwait?

Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.

Where does this Kuwait data come from?

The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 in Kuwait

Name: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 in Kuwait
Creator: World Bank
License: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)

Kuwait: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 was 47.19 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)

47.19

Change on year

unchanged

World rank

140th

of 188 countries

All-time high

47.19

in 2014

All-time low

47.19

in 2014

Years of data

2014–2019

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 in Kuwait, 2014–2019

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

The most recent figure for trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16 in Kuwait is 47.19, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.

That represents a change of unchanged over ten years.

Kuwait ranks 140th of 188 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

Countries ranked near Kuwait

137 Benin 50.07 compare
138 Palau 49.58 compare
139 Togo 49.03 compare
141 Trinidad and Tobago 47.08 compare
142 Libya 46.88 compare
143 Iraq 46.3 compare

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More reference data data for Kuwait

Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.385 (2050)
Emission Totals - Direct emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.2165 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Enteric Fermentation 131.78 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Crop Residues 1.39 (2050)
Emission Totals - Direct emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.24 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Burning - Crop residues 0.0876 (2050)
Emission Totals - Direct emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 1.47 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Agricultural Soils 491.73 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Agricultural Soil 491.73 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure left on Pa 405.04 (2050)

All data for Kuwait →

Frequently asked questions

What is trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16 in Kuwait?: Trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16 in Kuwait was 47.19 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16 recorded in Kuwait?: The highest recorded value was 47.19 in 2014.
What is the lowest trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16 recorded in Kuwait?: The lowest recorded value was 47.19 in 2014.
How does Kuwait rank for trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16?: Kuwait ranks 140th out of 188 countries with data for 2019.
Is trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16 rising or falling in Kuwait?: Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Kuwait data come from?: The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed: 10 August 2026

The score for the cost for border compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.