How does Libya rank for trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16?

Libya ranks 142nd out of 188 countries with data for 2019.

Is trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16 rising or falling in Libya?

Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.

Where does this Libya data come from?

The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 in Libya

Name: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 in Libya
Creator: World Bank
License: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)

Libya: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 was 46.88 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)

46.88

Change on year

unchanged

World rank

142nd

of 188 countries

All-time high

46.88

in 2014

All-time low

46.88

in 2014

Years of data

2014–2019

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 in Libya, 2014–2019

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

In 2019, trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16 in Libya stood at 46.88. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over ten years.

Libya ranks 142nd of 188 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.

Countries ranked near Libya

139 Togo 49.03 compare
140 Kuwait 47.19 compare
141 Trinidad and Tobago 47.08 compare
143 Iraq 46.3 compare
144 Suriname 45.17 compare
145 Iran 44.97 compare

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More reference data data for Libya

Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure applied to 56.6 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Agricultural Soil 2,049 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Manure Management 139.01 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Crop Residues 30.32 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure left on Pa 1,541 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure Management 23.14 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 7.73 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Enteric Fermentation 2,614 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture 4,806 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Burning - Crop re 0.8811 (2050)

All data for Libya →

Frequently asked questions

What is trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16 in Libya?: Trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16 in Libya was 46.88 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16 recorded in Libya?: The highest recorded value was 46.88 in 2014.
What is the lowest trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16 recorded in Libya?: The lowest recorded value was 46.88 in 2014.
How does Libya rank for trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16?: Libya ranks 142nd out of 188 countries with data for 2019.
Is trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16 rising or falling in Libya?: Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Libya data come from?: The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed: 10 August 2026

The score for the cost for border compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.