Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) in Libya

Libya: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) was 46.88 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)
46.88
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
144th
of 191 countries
All-time high
46.88
in 2014
All-time low
46.88
in 2014
Years of data
6
2014–2019

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) in Libya, 2014–2019

010203040502014201620192014: 46.92015: 46.92016: 46.92017: 46.92018: 46.92019: 46.9

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

In 2019, trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) in Libya stood at 46.88. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over ten years.

Libya ranks 144th of 191 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) in Libya, year by year

Annual values for Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in Libya, 2014 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2014 46.88 —
2015 46.88 +0.0%
2016 46.88 +0.0%
2017 46.88 +0.0%
2018 46.88 +0.0%
2019 46.88 +0.0%

Libya compared with similar countries

  • Libya's 46.88 is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 68.83, 68% of the median. (56 countries reporting)
  • Libya's 46.88 is below the median for Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan, which is 53.86, 87% of the median. (23 countries reporting)

Countries ranked near Libya

  1. 141 Togo 49.03 compare
  2. 142 Kuwait 47.19 compare
  3. 143 Trinidad and Tobago 47.08 compare
  4. 145 Iraq 46.3 compare
  5. 146 Suriname 45.17 compare
  6. 147 Iran 44.97 compare

See the full ranking of 191 places →

More reference data data for Libya

All data for Libya →

Frequently asked questions

What is trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) in Libya?
Trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) in Libya was 46.88 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) recorded in Libya?
The highest recorded value was 46.88 in 2014.
What is the lowest trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) recorded in Libya?
The lowest recorded value was 46.88 in 2014.
How does Libya rank for trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd)?
Libya ranks 144th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
Is trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) rising or falling in Libya?
Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Libya data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) in Libya. Statizoid. Retrieved 29 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/trading-across-borders-cost-to-import-border-compliance-usd-db16-20-methodology-score/libya/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/trading-across-borders-cost-to-import-border-compliance-usd-db16-20-methodology-score/libya/">Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) in Libya</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 1,145 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the cost for border compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.