Kuwait vs Libya: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16

Kuwait
47.19
in 2019
Libya
46.88
in 2019
Kuwait rank
140th
Libya rank
142nd

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 over time

  • Kuwait
  • Libya
01020304050201420162019

How they compare

Kuwait currently reports 47.19 against 46.88 in Libya, a difference of 0.31.

Across all 6 years both countries report, Kuwait has been ahead every year.

Kuwait ranks 140th and Libya ranks 142nd of 188 countries.

Kuwait has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16, Kuwait or Libya?
Kuwait, at 47.19 against 46.88 in Libya as of 2019.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16 between Kuwait and Libya?
0.31, with Kuwait ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kuwait and Libya?
6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
How do Kuwait and Libya rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16?
Kuwait ranks 140th and Libya ranks 142nd of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the cost for border compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.