Kuwait vs Palau: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16

Kuwait
47.19
in 2019
Palau
49.58
in 2019
Kuwait rank
140th
Palau rank
138th

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 over time

  • Kuwait
  • Palau
01020304050201420162019

How they compare

Palau currently reports 49.58 against 47.19 in Kuwait, a difference of 2.39.

That makes Palau's figure about 1.1 times Kuwait's.

Across all 6 years both countries report, Palau has been ahead every year.

Kuwait ranks 140th and Palau ranks 138th of 188 countries.

Palau has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16, Kuwait or Palau?
Palau, at 49.58 against 47.19 in Kuwait as of 2019.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16 between Kuwait and Palau?
2.39, with Palau ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kuwait and Palau?
6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
How do Kuwait and Palau rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16?
Kuwait ranks 140th and Palau ranks 138th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the cost for border compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.