Is trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16 rising or falling in Benin?

Over the last ten years it is down 3.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.

Where does this Benin data come from?

The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 in Benin

Name: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 in Benin
Creator: World Bank
License: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)

Benin: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 was 50.07 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)

50.07

Change on year

unchanged

World rank

137th

of 188 countries

All-time high

51.74

in 2014

All-time low

50.07

in 2016

Years of data

2014–2019

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 in Benin, 2014–2019

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

The most recent figure for trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16 in Benin is 50.07, measured in 2019. That is the lowest value across all 6 years on record.

The figure is down 3.2% over ten years.

Benin ranks 137th of 188 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

Countries ranked near Benin

134 Cape Verde 51.04 compare
135 Madagascar 50.42 compare
136 Tunisia 50.32 compare
138 Palau 49.58 compare
139 Togo 49.03 compare
140 Kuwait 47.19 compare

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More reference data data for Benin

Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 2.03 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Burning - Crop residues 0.0882 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.8505 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.5244 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 8.56 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 10.71 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.1979 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 2.03 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.67 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture 2,839 (2050)

All data for Benin →

Frequently asked questions

What is trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16 in Benin?: Trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16 in Benin was 50.07 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16 recorded in Benin?: The highest recorded value was 51.74 in 2014.
What is the lowest trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16 recorded in Benin?: The lowest recorded value was 50.07 in 2016.
How does Benin rank for trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16?: Benin ranks 137th out of 188 countries with data for 2019.
Is trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16 rising or falling in Benin?: Over the last ten years it is down 3.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Benin data come from?: The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed: 10 August 2026

The score for the cost for border compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.