Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) in Palau

Palau: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) was 49.58 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)
49.58
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
140th
of 191 countries
All-time high
49.58
in 2014
All-time low
49.58
in 2014
Years of data
6
2014–2019

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) in Palau, 2014–2019

010203040502014201620192014: 49.62015: 49.62016: 49.62017: 49.62018: 49.62019: 49.6

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

Palau recorded 49.58 for trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) in 2019. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.

That represents a change of unchanged over ten years.

Palau ranks 140th of 191 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) in Palau, year by year

Annual values for Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in Palau, 2014 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2014 49.58 —
2015 49.58 +0.0%
2016 49.58 +0.0%
2017 49.58 +0.0%
2018 49.58 +0.0%
2019 49.58 +0.0%

Palau compared with similar countries

  • Palau's 49.58 is below the median for high income countries, which is 81.25, 61% of the median. (62 countries reporting)
  • Palau's 49.58 is below the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 70.98, 70% of the median. (28 countries reporting)

Countries ranked near Palau

  1. 137 Madagascar 50.42 compare
  2. 138 Tunisia 50.32 compare
  3. 139 Benin 50.07 compare
  4. 141 Togo 49.03 compare
  5. 142 Kuwait 47.19 compare
  6. 143 Trinidad and Tobago 47.08 compare

See the full ranking of 191 places →

More reference data data for Palau

All data for Palau →

Frequently asked questions

What is trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) in Palau?
Trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) in Palau was 49.58 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) recorded in Palau?
The highest recorded value was 49.58 in 2014.
What is the lowest trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) recorded in Palau?
The lowest recorded value was 49.58 in 2014.
How does Palau rank for trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd)?
Palau ranks 140th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
Is trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) rising or falling in Palau?
Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Palau data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) in Palau. Statizoid. Retrieved 29 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/trading-across-borders-cost-to-import-border-compliance-usd-db16-20-methodology-score/palau/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/trading-across-borders-cost-to-import-border-compliance-usd-db16-20-methodology-score/palau/">Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) in Palau</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 1,145 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the cost for border compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.