Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15) in Mauritius
Mauritius: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15) was 94.23 in 2014. ▲ Rising
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15) in Mauritius, 2005–2014
Source: World Bank.
Analysis
Mauritius recorded 94.23 for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15) in 2014. That is the highest value across all 10 years on record.
The figure is up 0.5% on the previous year and up 8.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15) in Mauritius peaked at 94.23 in 2014 and was at its lowest, 86.67, in 2005.
Mauritius ranks 21st of 184 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15) in Mauritius, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 86.67 | — |
| 2006 | 87.58 | +1.0% |
| 2007 | 88.39 | +0.9% |
| 2008 | 89.98 | +1.8% |
| 2009 | 90.85 | +1.0% |
| 2010 | 90.84 | -0.0% |
| 2011 | 91.15 | +0.3% |
| 2012 | 93.61 | +2.7% |
| 2013 | 93.75 | +0.1% |
| 2014 | 94.23 | +0.5% |
Mauritius compared with similar countries
- Mauritius's 94.23 is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 80.61, 1.2× the median. (55 countries reporting)
- Mauritius's 94.23 is above the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 71.41, 1.3× the median. (46 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 88.69 | 86.67 | 90.85 | 5 |
| 2010s | 92.72 | 90.84 | 94.23 | 5 |
Countries ranked near Mauritius
- 18 Panama 94.44 compare
- 18 United Arab Emirates 94.44 compare
- 20 South Korea 94.34 compare
- 22 Sao Tome and Principe 93.9 compare
- 23 Marshall Islands 93.79 compare
- 24 Brunei 93.57 compare
- 24 Seychelles 93.57 compare
More reference data data for Mauritius
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0102 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.0409 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.0513 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0002 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.0513 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0343 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.0167 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.2303 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.2885 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0008 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15) in Mauritius?
- Trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15) in Mauritius was 94.23 in 2014, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15) recorded in Mauritius?
- The highest recorded value was 94.23 in 2014.
- What is the lowest trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15) recorded in Mauritius?
- The lowest recorded value was 86.67 in 2005.
- How does Mauritius rank for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15)?
- Mauritius ranks 21st out of 184 countries with data for 2014.
- Is trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15) rising or falling in Mauritius?
- Over the last ten years it is up 8.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Mauritius data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 10 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The score for the cost to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.