Mauritius vs Panama: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me

Mauritius
94.23
in 2014
Panama
94.44
in 2014
Mauritius rank
21st
Panama rank
18th

Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me over time

  • Mauritius
  • Panama
020406080100200520092014

How they compare

Panama currently reports 94.44 against 94.23 in Mauritius, a difference of 0.21.

Across all 10 years both countries report, Panama has been ahead every year.

Mauritius ranks 21st and Panama ranks 18th of 181 countries.

Panama has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritius Panama Difference Ahead
2000s 88.69 97.23 8.54 Panama
2010s 92.72 95.83 3.12 Panama

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me, Mauritius or Panama?
Panama, at 94.44 against 94.23 in Mauritius as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me between Mauritius and Panama?
0.21, with Panama ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Panama?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Mauritius and Panama rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me?
Mauritius ranks 21st and Panama ranks 18th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the cost to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.