Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15) in South Korea
South Korea: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15) was 94.34 in 2014. ▲ Rising
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15) in South Korea, 2005–2014
Source: World Bank.
Analysis
In 2014, trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15) in South Korea stood at 94.34.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 1.6% on the previous year and up 3.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15) in South Korea peaked at 95.84 in 2013 and was at its lowest, 91.25, in 2005.
South Korea ranks 20th of 184 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15) in South Korea, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 91.25 | — |
| 2006 | 91.37 | +0.1% |
| 2007 | 92.13 | +0.8% |
| 2008 | 91.99 | -0.2% |
| 2009 | 93 | +1.1% |
| 2010 | 92.54 | -0.5% |
| 2011 | 95.31 | +3.0% |
| 2012 | 95.81 | +0.5% |
| 2013 | 95.84 | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 94.34 | -1.6% |
South Korea compared with similar countries
- South Korea's 94.34 is above the median for high income countries, which is 87.04, 1.1× the median. (59 countries reporting)
- South Korea's 94.34 is above the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 92.48, 1.0× the median. (27 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 91.95 | 91.25 | 93 | 5 |
| 2010s | 94.77 | 92.54 | 95.84 | 5 |
Countries ranked near South Korea
- 17 Taiwan 94.66 compare
- 18 Panama 94.44 compare
- 18 United Arab Emirates 94.44 compare
- 21 Mauritius 94.23 compare
- 22 Sao Tome and Principe 93.9 compare
- 23 Marshall Islands 93.79 compare
More reference data data for South Korea
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.9638 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.9281 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 3.55 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.2074 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 3.55 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 3.23 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 4.37 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 5.17 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 19.85 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 1.13 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15) in South Korea?
- Trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15) in South Korea was 94.34 in 2014, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15) recorded in South Korea?
- The highest recorded value was 95.84 in 2013.
- What is the lowest trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15) recorded in South Korea?
- The lowest recorded value was 91.25 in 2005.
- How does South Korea rank for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15)?
- South Korea ranks 20th out of 184 countries with data for 2014.
- Is trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15) rising or falling in South Korea?
- Over the last ten years it is up 3.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this South Korea data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 10 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The score for the cost to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.