Marshall Islands vs Mauritius: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me
Marshall Islands
93.79
in 2014
Mauritius
94.23
in 2014
Marshall Islands rank
23rd
Mauritius rank
21st
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me over time
- Marshall Islands
- Mauritius
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 94.23 against 93.79 in Marshall Islands, a difference of 0.44.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Marshall Islands ahead.
Marshall Islands ranks 23rd and Mauritius ranks 21st of 181 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Marshall Islands averaged higher in 1 and Mauritius in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Marshall Islands | Mauritius | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 88.61 | 88.69 | 0.0807 | Mauritius |
| 2010s | 93.81 | 92.72 | 1.1 | Marshall Islands |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me, Marshall Islands or Mauritius?
- Mauritius, at 94.23 against 93.79 in Marshall Islands as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me between Marshall Islands and Mauritius?
- 0.44, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Marshall Islands and Mauritius?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Marshall Islands and Mauritius rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me?
- Marshall Islands ranks 23rd and Mauritius ranks 21st of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.