Mauritius vs Sao Tome and Principe: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15)
Mauritius
94.23
in 2014
Sao Tome and Principe
93.9
in 2014
Mauritius rank
21st
Sao Tome and Principe rank
22nd
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15) over time
- Mauritius
- Sao Tome and Principe
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 94.23 against 93.9 in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 0.33.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Mauritius has been ahead every year.
Mauritius ranks 21st and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 22nd of 184 countries.
Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritius | Sao Tome and Principe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 88.69 | 68.04 | 20.65 | Mauritius |
| 2010s | 92.72 | 90.34 | 2.37 | Mauritius |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15), Mauritius or Sao Tome and Principe?
- Mauritius, at 94.23 against 93.9 in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15) between Mauritius and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 0.33, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Mauritius and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15)?
- Mauritius ranks 21st and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 22nd of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.