Mauritius vs Seychelles: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me
Mauritius
94.23
in 2014
Seychelles
93.57
in 2014
Mauritius rank
21st
Seychelles rank
24th
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me over time
- Mauritius
- Seychelles
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 94.23 against 93.57 in Seychelles, a difference of 0.66.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Mauritius ahead.
Mauritius ranks 21st and Seychelles ranks 24th of 181 countries.
Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritius | Seychelles | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 88.69 | 71.1 | 17.59 | Mauritius |
| 2010s | 92.72 | 89.84 | 2.88 | Mauritius |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me, Mauritius or Seychelles?
- Mauritius, at 94.23 against 93.57 in Seychelles as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me between Mauritius and Seychelles?
- 0.66, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Seychelles?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Mauritius and Seychelles rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me?
- Mauritius ranks 21st and Seychelles ranks 24th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.