Is trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) ( rising or falling in Laos?

Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.

Where does this Laos data come from?

The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) ( in Laos

Name: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) ( in Laos
Creator: World Bank
License: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)

Laos: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) ( was 41.25 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)

41.25

Change on year

unchanged

World rank

163rd

of 188 countries

All-time high

41.25

in 2014

All-time low

41.25

in 2014

Years of data

2014–2019

Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) ( in Laos, 2014–2019

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

Laos recorded 41.25 for trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) ( in 2019. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.

That represents a change of unchanged over ten years.

That places Laos 163rd out of 188 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the bottom quarter.

Countries ranked near Laos

160 Kuwait 43.25 compare
161 Sierra Leone 43.21 compare
162 Uruguay 42.25 compare
164 Angola 40 compare
165 Nigeria 37.5 compare
165 Trinidad and Tobago 37.5 compare

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More reference data data for Laos

Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.913 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 1.88 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.3021 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.6615 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 1.88 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure applied to 587.77 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - Enteric Fermentat 7,569 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - Burning - Crop re 63.43 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure left on Pa 1,343 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure Management 1,049 (2050)

All data for Laos →

Frequently asked questions

What is trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) ( in Laos?: Trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) ( in Laos was 41.25 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) ( recorded in Laos?: The highest recorded value was 41.25 in 2014.
What is the lowest trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) ( recorded in Laos?: The lowest recorded value was 41.25 in 2014.
How does Laos rank for trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) (?: Laos ranks 163rd out of 188 countries with data for 2019.
Is trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) ( rising or falling in Laos?: Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Laos data come from?: The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed: 10 August 2026

The score for the cost for documentary compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.