Lao People's Democratic Republic vs Trinidad and Tobago: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD)
Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) over time
- Lao People's Democratic Republic
- Trinidad and Tobago
How they compare
Lao People's Democratic Republic currently reports 41.25 against 37.5 in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 3.75.
That makes Lao People's Democratic Republic's figure about 1.1 times Trinidad and Tobago's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Lao People's Democratic Republic has been ahead every year.
Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 166th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 168th of 191 countries.
Lao People's Democratic Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd), Lao People's Democratic Republic or Trinidad and Tobago?
- Lao People's Democratic Republic, at 41.25 against 37.5 in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) between Lao People's Democratic Republic and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 3.75, with Lao People's Democratic Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lao People's Democratic Republic and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Lao People's Democratic Republic and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd)?
- Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 166th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 168th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost for documentary compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.