Is trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) ( rising or falling in Uruguay?

Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.

Where does this Uruguay data come from?

The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) ( in Uruguay

Name: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) ( in Uruguay
Creator: World Bank
License: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)

Uruguay: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) ( was 42.25 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)

42.25

Change on year

unchanged

World rank

162nd

of 188 countries

All-time high

42.25

in 2014

All-time low

42.25

in 2014

Years of data

2014–2019

Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) ( in Uruguay, 2014–2019

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

Uruguay recorded 42.25 for trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) ( in 2019. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.

The figure is unchanged over ten years.

Uruguay ranks 162nd of 188 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.

Countries ranked near Uruguay

159 Brazil 43.4 compare
160 Kuwait 43.25 compare
161 Sierra Leone 43.21 compare
163 Laos 41.25 compare
164 Angola 40 compare
165 Nigeria 37.5 compare
165 Trinidad and Tobago 37.5 compare

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More reference data data for Uruguay

Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.2999 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 4.87 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 6.98 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.3685 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 6.98 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.01 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.2195 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 24.48 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 33.62 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 2.01 (2050)

All data for Uruguay →

Frequently asked questions

What is trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) ( in Uruguay?: Trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) ( in Uruguay was 42.25 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) ( recorded in Uruguay?: The highest recorded value was 42.25 in 2014.
What is the lowest trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) ( recorded in Uruguay?: The lowest recorded value was 42.25 in 2014.
How does Uruguay rank for trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) (?: Uruguay ranks 162nd out of 188 countries with data for 2019.
Is trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) ( rising or falling in Uruguay?: Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Uruguay data come from?: The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed: 10 August 2026

The score for the cost for documentary compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.