Lao People's Democratic Republic vs Sierra Leone: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD)
Lao People's Democratic Republic
41.25
in 2019
Sierra Leone
43.21
in 2019
Lao People's Democratic Republic rank
165th
Sierra Leone rank
163rd
Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) over time
- Lao People's Democratic Republic
- Sierra Leone
How they compare
Sierra Leone currently reports 43.21 against 41.25 in Lao People's Democratic Republic, a difference of 1.96.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Sierra Leone has been ahead every year.
Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 165th and Sierra Leone ranks 163rd of 190 countries.
Sierra Leone has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd), Lao People's Democratic Republic or Sierra Leone?
- Sierra Leone, at 43.21 against 41.25 in Lao People's Democratic Republic as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) between Lao People's Democratic Republic and Sierra Leone?
- 1.96, with Sierra Leone ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lao People's Democratic Republic and Sierra Leone?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Lao People's Democratic Republic and Sierra Leone rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd)?
- Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 165th and Sierra Leone ranks 163rd of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost for documentary compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.