Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) in Angola

Angola: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) was 40 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)
40
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
167th
of 191 countries
All-time high
40
in 2014
All-time low
40
in 2014
Years of data
6
2014–2019

Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) in Angola, 2014–2019

0102030402014201620192014: 402015: 402016: 402017: 402018: 402019: 40

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

In 2019, trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) in Angola stood at 40. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over ten years.

Angola ranks 167th of 191 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.

Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) in Angola, year by year

Annual values for Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in Angola, 2014 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2014 40 —
2015 40 +0.0%
2016 40 +0.0%
2017 40 +0.0%
2018 40 +0.0%
2019 40 +0.0%

Angola compared with similar countries

  • Angola's 40 is below the median for lower middle income countries, which is 69, 58% of the median. (47 countries reporting)
  • Angola's 40 is below the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 60.62, 66% of the median. (48 countries reporting)

Countries ranked near Angola

  1. 164 Sierra Leone 43.21 compare
  2. 165 Uruguay 42.25 compare
  3. 166 Laos 41.25 compare
  4. 168 Nigeria 37.5 compare
  5. 168 Trinidad and Tobago 37.5 compare
  6. 170 Solomon Islands 35.75 compare

See the full ranking of 191 places →

More reference data data for Angola

All data for Angola →

Frequently asked questions

What is trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) in Angola?
Trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) in Angola was 40 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) recorded in Angola?
The highest recorded value was 40 in 2014.
What is the lowest trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) recorded in Angola?
The lowest recorded value was 40 in 2014.
How does Angola rank for trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd)?
Angola ranks 167th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
Is trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) rising or falling in Angola?
Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Angola data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) in Angola. Statizoid. Retrieved 29 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/trading-across-borders-cost-to-export-documentary-compliance-usd-db16-20-methodology-score/angola/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/trading-across-borders-cost-to-export-documentary-compliance-usd-db16-20-methodology-score/angola/">Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) in Angola</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 1,145 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the cost for documentary compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.