Angola vs Lao People's Democratic Republic: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD)
Angola
40
in 2019
Lao People's Democratic Republic
41.25
in 2019
Angola rank
166th
Lao People's Democratic Republic rank
165th
Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) over time
- Angola
- Lao People's Democratic Republic
How they compare
Lao People's Democratic Republic currently reports 41.25 against 40 in Angola, a difference of 1.25.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Lao People's Democratic Republic has been ahead every year.
Angola ranks 166th and Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 165th of 190 countries.
Lao People's Democratic Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd), Angola or Lao People's Democratic Republic?
- Lao People's Democratic Republic, at 41.25 against 40 in Angola as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) between Angola and Lao People's Democratic Republic?
- 1.25, with Lao People's Democratic Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Lao People's Democratic Republic?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Angola and Lao People's Democratic Republic rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd)?
- Angola ranks 166th and Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 165th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost for documentary compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.