Resolving insolvency: Management of debtor's assets index (0-6) in Congo, Democratic Republic of the

Congo, Democratic Republic of the: Resolving insolvency: Management of debtor's assets index (0-6) was 5.5 DB15-20 methodology in 2019. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2019)
5.5 DB15-20 methodology
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
33rd
of 190 countries
All-time high
5.5 DB15-20 methodology
in 2013
All-time low
2 DB15-20 methodology
in 2003
Years of data
17
2003–2019

Resolving insolvency: Management of debtor's assets index (0-6) in Congo, Democratic Republic of the, 2003–2019

02462003201120192003: 2 DB15-20 methodology2004: 2 DB15-20 methodology2005: 2 DB15-20 methodology2006: 2 DB15-20 methodology2007: 2 DB15-20 methodology2008: 2 DB15-20 methodology2009: 2 DB15-20 methodology2010: 2 DB15-20 methodology2011: 2 DB15-20 methodology2012: 2 DB15-20 methodology2013: 5.5 DB15-20 methodology2014: 5.5 DB15-20 methodology2015: 5.5 DB15-20 methodology2016: 5.5 DB15-20 methodology2017: 5.5 DB15-20 methodology2018: 5.5 DB15-20 methodology2019: 5.5 DB15-20 methodology

Source: World Bank. Measured in DB15-20 methodology.

Analysis

Congo, Democratic Republic of the recorded 5.5 DB15-20 methodology for resolving insolvency: management of debtor's assets index (0-6) in 2019. That is the highest value across all 17 years on record.

The figure is up 175.0% over ten years.

Over the whole period, resolving insolvency: management of debtor's assets index (0-6) in Congo, Democratic Republic of the peaked at 5.5 DB15-20 methodology in 2013 and was at its lowest, 2 DB15-20 methodology, in 2003.

Congo, Democratic Republic of the ranks 33rd of 190 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Resolving insolvency: Management of debtor's assets index (0-6) in Congo, Democratic Republic of the, year by year

Annual values for Resolving insolvency: Management of debtor's assets index (0-6) (DB15-20 methodology) in Congo, Democratic Republic of the, 2003 to 2019.
Year DB15-20 methodology Change
2003 2 DB15-20 methodology
2004 2 DB15-20 methodology +0.0%
2005 2 DB15-20 methodology +0.0%
2006 2 DB15-20 methodology +0.0%
2007 2 DB15-20 methodology +0.0%
2008 2 DB15-20 methodology +0.0%
2009 2 DB15-20 methodology +0.0%
2010 2 DB15-20 methodology +0.0%
2011 2 DB15-20 methodology +0.0%
2012 2 DB15-20 methodology +0.0%
2013 5.5 DB15-20 methodology +175.0%
2014 5.5 DB15-20 methodology +0.0%
2015 5.5 DB15-20 methodology +0.0%
2016 5.5 DB15-20 methodology +0.0%
2017 5.5 DB15-20 methodology +0.0%
2018 5.5 DB15-20 methodology +0.0%
2019 5.5 DB15-20 methodology +0.0%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 2 DB15-20 methodology 2 DB15-20 methodology 2 DB15-20 methodology 7
2010s 4.45 DB15-20 methodology 2 DB15-20 methodology 5.5 DB15-20 methodology 10

Countries ranked near Congo, Democratic Republic of the

  1. 33 Pakistan 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
  2. 33 Mexico 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
  3. 33 Brazil 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
  4. 33 Austria 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
  5. 33 Belarus 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
  6. 33 Benin 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
  7. 33 Burkina Faso 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
  8. 33 Cameroon 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
  9. 33 Central African Republic 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
  10. 33 Chad 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
  11. 33 Colombia 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
  12. 33 Comoros 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
  13. 33 Congo 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
  14. 33 Côte d'Ivoire 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
  15. 33 Czechia 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
  16. 33 Djibouti 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
  17. 33 Dominican Republic 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
  18. 33 Equatorial Guinea 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
  19. 33 Estonia 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
  20. 33 Gabon 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
  21. 33 Georgia 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
  22. 33 Greece 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
  23. 33 Guinea 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
  24. 33 Guinea-Bissau 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
  25. 33 Israel 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
  26. 33 Italy 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
  27. 33 Kenya 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
  28. 33 Republic of Korea 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
  29. 33 Madagascar 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
  30. 33 Mali 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
  31. 33 Mauritius 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
  32. 33 Morocco 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
  33. 33 Niger 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
  34. 33 Philippines 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
  35. 33 Portugal 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
  36. 33 Senegal 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
  37. 33 Taiwan, China 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
  38. 33 Togo 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
  39. 33 Tunisia 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More reference data data for Congo, Democratic Republic of the

All data for Congo, Democratic Republic of the →

Frequently asked questions

What is resolving insolvency: management of debtor's assets index (0-6) in Congo, Democratic Republic of the?
Resolving insolvency: management of debtor's assets index (0-6) in Congo, Democratic Republic of the was 5.5 DB15-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest resolving insolvency: management of debtor's assets index (0-6) recorded in Congo, Democratic Republic of the?
The highest recorded value was 5.5 DB15-20 methodology in 2013.
What is the lowest resolving insolvency: management of debtor's assets index (0-6) recorded in Congo, Democratic Republic of the?
The lowest recorded value was 2 DB15-20 methodology in 2003.
How does Congo, Democratic Republic of the rank for resolving insolvency: management of debtor's assets index (0-6)?
Congo, Democratic Republic of the ranks 33rd out of 190 countries with data for 2019.
Is resolving insolvency: management of debtor's assets index (0-6) rising or falling in Congo, Democratic Republic of the?
Over the last ten years it is up 175.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Congo, Democratic Republic of the data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Resolving insolvency: Management of debtor's assets index (0-6) (DB15-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 17 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Resolving insolvency: Management of debtor's assets index (0-6) in Congo, Democratic Republic of the. Statizoid. Retrieved 23 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/resolving-insolvency-management-of-debtor-s-assets-index-0-6-db15-20-methodology/congo-dem-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/resolving-insolvency-management-of-debtor-s-assets-index-0-6-db15-20-methodology/congo-dem-rep/">Resolving insolvency: Management of debtor's assets index (0-6) in Congo, Democratic Republic of the</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Resolving insolvency: Management of debtor's assets index (0-6) (DB15-20 methodology)
Unit
DB15-20 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 3,230 data points, 2003–2019
Last refreshed

The management of debtor's assets index has six components: (i) whether the debtor (or an insolvency representative on its behalf) can continue performing contracts essential to the debtor’s survival; (ii) whether the debtor (or an insolvency representative on its behalf) can reject overly burdensome contracts; (iii) whether undervalued transactions entered into before commencement of insolvency proceedings can be avoided after proceedings are initiated; (iv) whether transactions entered into before commencement of insolvency proceedings that give preference to one or several creditors can be avoided after proceedings are initiated; (v) whether the insolvency framework includes specific provisions that allow the debtor (or an insolvency representa­tive on its behalf), after commencement of insolvency proceedings, to obtain financing necessary to function during the proceedings; and (vi) whether post-commencement finance receives priority over ordinary unse­cured creditors during distribution of assets.