Statizoid

Resolving insolvency: Management of debtor's assets index (0-6) in Belarus

Belarus: Resolving insolvency: Management of debtor's assets index (0-6) was 5.5 DB15-20 methodology in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)
5.5 DB15-20 methodology
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
34th
of 191 countries
All-time high
5.5 DB15-20 methodology
in 2003
All-time low
5.5 DB15-20 methodology
in 2003
Years of data
17
2003–2019

Resolving insolvency: Management of debtor's assets index (0-6) in Belarus, 2003–2019

02462003201120192003: 5.5 DB15-20 methodology2004: 5.5 DB15-20 methodology2005: 5.5 DB15-20 methodology2006: 5.5 DB15-20 methodology2007: 5.5 DB15-20 methodology2008: 5.5 DB15-20 methodology2009: 5.5 DB15-20 methodology2010: 5.5 DB15-20 methodology2011: 5.5 DB15-20 methodology2012: 5.5 DB15-20 methodology2013: 5.5 DB15-20 methodology2014: 5.5 DB15-20 methodology2015: 5.5 DB15-20 methodology2016: 5.5 DB15-20 methodology2017: 5.5 DB15-20 methodology2018: 5.5 DB15-20 methodology2019: 5.5 DB15-20 methodology

Source: World Bank. Measured in DB15-20 methodology.

Analysis

Belarus recorded 5.5 DB15-20 methodology for resolving insolvency: management of debtor's assets index (0-6) in 2019. That is the highest value across all 17 years on record.

That represents a change of unchanged over ten years.

Over the whole period, resolving insolvency: management of debtor's assets index (0-6) in Belarus peaked at 5.5 DB15-20 methodology in 2003 and was at its lowest, 5.5 DB15-20 methodology, in 2003.

That places Belarus 34th out of 191 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the top quarter.

Resolving insolvency: Management of debtor's assets index (0-6) in Belarus, year by year

Year DB15-20 methodology Change
2003 5.5 DB15-20 methodology —
2004 5.5 DB15-20 methodology +0.0%
2005 5.5 DB15-20 methodology +0.0%
2006 5.5 DB15-20 methodology +0.0%
2007 5.5 DB15-20 methodology +0.0%
2008 5.5 DB15-20 methodology +0.0%
2009 5.5 DB15-20 methodology +0.0%
2010 5.5 DB15-20 methodology +0.0%
2011 5.5 DB15-20 methodology +0.0%
2012 5.5 DB15-20 methodology +0.0%
2013 5.5 DB15-20 methodology +0.0%
2014 5.5 DB15-20 methodology +0.0%
2015 5.5 DB15-20 methodology +0.0%
2016 5.5 DB15-20 methodology +0.0%
2017 5.5 DB15-20 methodology +0.0%
2018 5.5 DB15-20 methodology +0.0%
2019 5.5 DB15-20 methodology +0.0%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 5.5 DB15-20 methodology 5.5 DB15-20 methodology 5.5 DB15-20 methodology 7
2010s 5.5 DB15-20 methodology 5.5 DB15-20 methodology 5.5 DB15-20 methodology 10

Countries ranked near Belarus

  1. 34 Pakistan 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
  2. 34 Mexico 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
  3. 34 Brazil 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
  4. 34 Austria 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
  5. 34 Benin 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
  6. 34 Burkina Faso 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
  7. 34 Cameroon 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
  8. 34 Central African Republic 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
  9. 34 Chad 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
  10. 34 Colombia 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
  11. 34 Comoros 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
  12. 34 Congo, Democratic Republic of the 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
  13. 34 Congo 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
  14. 34 Côte d'Ivoire 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
  15. 34 Czechia 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
  16. 34 Djibouti 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
  17. 34 Dominican Republic 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
  18. 34 Equatorial Guinea 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
  19. 34 Estonia 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
  20. 34 Gabon 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
  21. 34 Georgia 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
  22. 34 Greece 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
  23. 34 Guinea 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
  24. 34 Guinea-Bissau 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
  25. 34 Israel 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
  26. 34 Italy 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
  27. 34 Kenya 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
  28. 34 Republic of Korea 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
  29. 34 Madagascar 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
  30. 34 Mali 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
  31. 34 Mauritius 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
  32. 34 Morocco 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
  33. 34 Niger 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
  34. 34 Philippines 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
  35. 34 Portugal 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
  36. 34 Senegal 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
  37. 34 Taiwan, China 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
  38. 34 Togo 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
  39. 34 Tunisia 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare

See the full ranking of 191 places →

More reference data data for Belarus

All data for Belarus →

Frequently asked questions

What is resolving insolvency: management of debtor's assets index (0-6) in Belarus?
Resolving insolvency: management of debtor's assets index (0-6) in Belarus was 5.5 DB15-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest resolving insolvency: management of debtor's assets index (0-6) recorded in Belarus?
The highest recorded value was 5.5 DB15-20 methodology in 2003.
What is the lowest resolving insolvency: management of debtor's assets index (0-6) recorded in Belarus?
The lowest recorded value was 5.5 DB15-20 methodology in 2003.
How does Belarus rank for resolving insolvency: management of debtor's assets index (0-6)?
Belarus ranks 34th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
Is resolving insolvency: management of debtor's assets index (0-6) rising or falling in Belarus?
Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Belarus data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Resolving insolvency: Management of debtor's assets index (0-6) (DB15-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 17 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Resolving insolvency: Management of debtor's assets index (0-6) in Belarus. Statizoid. Retrieved 24 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/resolving-insolvency-management-of-debtor-s-assets-index-0-6-db15-20-methodology/belarus/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/resolving-insolvency-management-of-debtor-s-assets-index-0-6-db15-20-methodology/belarus/">Resolving insolvency: Management of debtor's assets index (0-6) in Belarus</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Resolving insolvency: Management of debtor's assets index (0-6) (DB15-20 methodology)
Unit
DB15-20 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 3,247 data points, 2003–2019
Last refreshed

The management of debtor's assets index has six components: (i) whether the debtor (or an insolvency representative on its behalf) can continue performing contracts essential to the debtor’s survival; (ii) whether the debtor (or an insolvency representative on its behalf) can reject overly burdensome contracts; (iii) whether undervalued transactions entered into before commencement of insolvency proceedings can be avoided after proceedings are initiated; (iv) whether transactions entered into before commencement of insolvency proceedings that give preference to one or several creditors can be avoided after proceedings are initiated; (v) whether the insolvency framework includes specific provisions that allow the debtor (or an insolvency representa­tive on its behalf), after commencement of insolvency proceedings, to obtain financing necessary to function during the proceedings; and (vi) whether post-commencement finance receives priority over ordinary unse­cured creditors during distribution of assets.