Resolving insolvency: Management of debtor's assets index (0-6) in Djibouti
Djibouti: Resolving insolvency: Management of debtor's assets index (0-6) was 5.5 DB15-20 methodology in 2019. ◆ Volatile
Resolving insolvency: Management of debtor's assets index (0-6) in Djibouti, 2003–2019
Source: World Bank. Measured in DB15-20 methodology.
Analysis
In 2019, resolving insolvency: management of debtor's assets index (0-6) in Djibouti stood at 5.5 DB15-20 methodology. That is the highest value across all 17 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 175.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, resolving insolvency: management of debtor's assets index (0-6) in Djibouti peaked at 5.5 DB15-20 methodology in 2013 and was at its lowest, 2 DB15-20 methodology, in 2003.
Djibouti ranks 34th of 191 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Resolving insolvency: Management of debtor's assets index (0-6) in Djibouti, year by year
| Year | DB15-20 methodology | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2003 | 2 DB15-20 methodology | — |
| 2004 | 2 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2005 | 2 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2006 | 2 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 2 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 2 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 2 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 2 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 2 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 2 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 5.5 DB15-20 methodology | +175.0% |
| 2014 | 5.5 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 5.5 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 5.5 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 5.5 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 5.5 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 5.5 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2 DB15-20 methodology | 2 DB15-20 methodology | 2 DB15-20 methodology | 7 |
| 2010s | 4.45 DB15-20 methodology | 2 DB15-20 methodology | 5.5 DB15-20 methodology | 10 |
Countries ranked near Djibouti
- 34 Pakistan 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 34 Mexico 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 34 Brazil 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 34 Austria 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 34 Belarus 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 34 Benin 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 34 Burkina Faso 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 34 Cameroon 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 34 Central African Republic 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 34 Chad 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 34 Colombia 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 34 Comoros 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 34 Congo, Democratic Republic of the 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 34 Congo 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 34 Côte d'Ivoire 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 34 Czechia 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 34 Dominican Republic 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 34 Equatorial Guinea 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 34 Estonia 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 34 Gabon 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 34 Georgia 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 34 Greece 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 34 Guinea 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 34 Guinea-Bissau 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 34 Israel 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 34 Italy 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 34 Kenya 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 34 Republic of Korea 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 34 Madagascar 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 34 Mali 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 34 Mauritius 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 34 Morocco 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 34 Niger 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 34 Philippines 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 34 Portugal 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 34 Senegal 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 34 Taiwan 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 34 Togo 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 34 Tunisia 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
More reference data data for Djibouti
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0052 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.2231 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.2286 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0003 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.2286 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0175 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.0092 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.01 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 1.04 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0016 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is resolving insolvency: management of debtor's assets index (0-6) in Djibouti?
- Resolving insolvency: management of debtor's assets index (0-6) in Djibouti was 5.5 DB15-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest resolving insolvency: management of debtor's assets index (0-6) recorded in Djibouti?
- The highest recorded value was 5.5 DB15-20 methodology in 2013.
- What is the lowest resolving insolvency: management of debtor's assets index (0-6) recorded in Djibouti?
- The lowest recorded value was 2 DB15-20 methodology in 2003.
- How does Djibouti rank for resolving insolvency: management of debtor's assets index (0-6)?
- Djibouti ranks 34th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
- Is resolving insolvency: management of debtor's assets index (0-6) rising or falling in Djibouti?
- Over the last ten years it is up 175.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Djibouti data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Resolving insolvency: Management of debtor's assets index (0-6) (DB15-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 17 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The management of debtor's assets index has six components: (i) whether the debtor (or an insolvency representative on its behalf) can continue performing contracts essential to the debtor’s survival; (ii) whether the debtor (or an insolvency representative on its behalf) can reject overly burdensome contracts; (iii) whether undervalued transactions entered into before commencement of insolvency proceedings can be avoided after proceedings are initiated; (iv) whether transactions entered into before commencement of insolvency proceedings that give preference to one or several creditors can be avoided after proceedings are initiated; (v) whether the insolvency framework includes specific provisions that allow the debtor (or an insolvency representative on its behalf), after commencement of insolvency proceedings, to obtain financing necessary to function during the proceedings; and (vi) whether post-commencement finance receives priority over ordinary unsecured creditors during distribution of assets.