Resolving insolvency: Management of debtor's assets index (0-6) in Mexico
Mexico: Resolving insolvency: Management of debtor's assets index (0-6) was 5.5 DB15-20 methodology in 2019. ▲ Rising
Resolving insolvency: Management of debtor's assets index (0-6) in Mexico, 2003–2019
Source: World Bank. Measured in DB15-20 methodology.
Analysis
In 2019, resolving insolvency: management of debtor's assets index (0-6) in Mexico stood at 5.5 DB15-20 methodology. That is the highest value across all 17 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 37.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, resolving insolvency: management of debtor's assets index (0-6) in Mexico peaked at 5.5 DB15-20 methodology in 2014 and was at its lowest, 4 DB15-20 methodology, in 2003.
Mexico ranks 34th of 191 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 17 years of available data.
Resolving insolvency: Management of debtor's assets index (0-6) in Mexico, year by year
| Year | DB15-20 methodology | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2003 | 4 DB15-20 methodology | — |
| 2004 | 4 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2005 | 4 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2006 | 4 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 4 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 4 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 4 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 4 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 4 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 4 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 4 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 5.5 DB15-20 methodology | +37.5% |
| 2015 | 5.5 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 5.5 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 5.5 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 5.5 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 5.5 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 4 DB15-20 methodology | 4 DB15-20 methodology | 4 DB15-20 methodology | 7 |
| 2010s | 4.9 DB15-20 methodology | 4 DB15-20 methodology | 5.5 DB15-20 methodology | 10 |
Countries ranked near Mexico
- 34 Pakistan 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 34 Brazil 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 34 Austria 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 34 Belarus 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 34 Benin 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 34 Burkina Faso 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 34 Cameroon 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 34 Central African Republic 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 34 Chad 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 34 Colombia 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 34 Comoros 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 34 Congo, Democratic Republic of the 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 34 Congo 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 34 Côte d'Ivoire 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 34 Czechia 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 34 Djibouti 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 34 Dominican Republic 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 34 Equatorial Guinea 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 34 Estonia 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 34 Gabon 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 34 Georgia 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 34 Greece 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 34 Guinea 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 34 Guinea-Bissau 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 34 Israel 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 34 Italy 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 34 Kenya 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 34 Republic of Korea 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 34 Madagascar 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 34 Mali 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 34 Mauritius 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 34 Morocco 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 34 Niger 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 34 Philippines 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 34 Portugal 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 34 Senegal 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 34 Taiwan, China 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 34 Togo 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 34 Tunisia 5.5 DB15-20 methodology compare
More reference data data for Mexico
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 4.11 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 16.66 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 32.65 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 1.75 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 32.65 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 13.78 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 7.36 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 84.69 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 157.18 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 9.55 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is resolving insolvency: management of debtor's assets index (0-6) in Mexico?
- Resolving insolvency: management of debtor's assets index (0-6) in Mexico was 5.5 DB15-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest resolving insolvency: management of debtor's assets index (0-6) recorded in Mexico?
- The highest recorded value was 5.5 DB15-20 methodology in 2014.
- What is the lowest resolving insolvency: management of debtor's assets index (0-6) recorded in Mexico?
- The lowest recorded value was 4 DB15-20 methodology in 2003.
- How does Mexico rank for resolving insolvency: management of debtor's assets index (0-6)?
- Mexico ranks 34th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
- Is resolving insolvency: management of debtor's assets index (0-6) rising or falling in Mexico?
- Over the last ten years it is up 37.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Mexico data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Resolving insolvency: Management of debtor's assets index (0-6) (DB15-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 17 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The management of debtor's assets index has six components: (i) whether the debtor (or an insolvency representative on its behalf) can continue performing contracts essential to the debtor’s survival; (ii) whether the debtor (or an insolvency representative on its behalf) can reject overly burdensome contracts; (iii) whether undervalued transactions entered into before commencement of insolvency proceedings can be avoided after proceedings are initiated; (iv) whether transactions entered into before commencement of insolvency proceedings that give preference to one or several creditors can be avoided after proceedings are initiated; (v) whether the insolvency framework includes specific provisions that allow the debtor (or an insolvency representative on its behalf), after commencement of insolvency proceedings, to obtain financing necessary to function during the proceedings; and (vi) whether post-commencement finance receives priority over ordinary unsecured creditors during distribution of assets.