Congo, Democratic Republic of the vs Georgia: Resolving insolvency: Management of debtor's assets index (0-6)

Congo, Democratic Republic of the
5.5 DB15-20 methodology
in 2019
Georgia
5.5 DB15-20 methodology
in 2019
Congo, Democratic Republic of the rank
34th
Georgia rank
34th

Resolving insolvency: Management of debtor's assets index (0-6) over time

  • Congo, Democratic Republic of the
  • Georgia
0246200320112019

How they compare

Congo, Democratic Republic of the currently reports 5.5 DB15-20 methodology against 5.5 DB15-20 methodology in Georgia, a difference of 0 DB15-20 methodology.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Georgia ahead.

Congo, Democratic Republic of the ranks 34th and Georgia ranks 34th of 191 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Congo, Democratic Republic of the averaged higher in 1 and Georgia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo, Democratic Republic of the Georgia Difference Ahead
2000s 2 DB15-20 methodology 4.93 DB15-20 methodology 2.93 DB15-20 methodology Georgia
2010s 4.45 DB15-20 methodology 4.1 DB15-20 methodology 0.35 DB15-20 methodology Congo, Democratic Republic of the

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher resolving insolvency: management of debtor's assets index (0-6), Congo, Democratic Republic of the or Georgia?
Congo, Democratic Republic of the, at 5.5 DB15-20 methodology against 5.5 DB15-20 methodology in Georgia as of 2019.
What is the difference in resolving insolvency: management of debtor's assets index (0-6) between Congo, Democratic Republic of the and Georgia?
0 DB15-20 methodology, with Congo, Democratic Republic of the ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo, Democratic Republic of the and Georgia?
17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
How do Congo, Democratic Republic of the and Georgia rank globally for resolving insolvency: management of debtor's assets index (0-6)?
Congo, Democratic Republic of the ranks 34th and Georgia ranks 34th of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Resolving insolvency: Management of debtor's assets index (0-6) (DB15-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo, Democratic Republic of the vs Georgia: Resolving insolvency: Management of debtor's assets index (0-6). Statizoid. Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/resolving-insolvency-management-of-debtor-s-assets-index-0-6-db15-20-methodology/congo-dem-rep/georgia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/resolving-insolvency-management-of-debtor-s-assets-index-0-6-db15-20-methodology/congo-dem-rep/georgia/">Congo, Democratic Republic of the vs Georgia: Resolving insolvency: Management of debtor's assets index (0-6)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Resolving insolvency: Management of debtor's assets index (0-6) (DB15-20 methodology)
Unit
DB15-20 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 3,247 data points, 2003–2019
Last refreshed

The management of debtor's assets index has six components: (i) whether the debtor (or an insolvency representative on its behalf) can continue performing contracts essential to the debtor’s survival; (ii) whether the debtor (or an insolvency representative on its behalf) can reject overly burdensome contracts; (iii) whether undervalued transactions entered into before commencement of insolvency proceedings can be avoided after proceedings are initiated; (iv) whether transactions entered into before commencement of insolvency proceedings that give preference to one or several creditors can be avoided after proceedings are initiated; (v) whether the insolvency framework includes specific provisions that allow the debtor (or an insolvency representa­tive on its behalf), after commencement of insolvency proceedings, to obtain financing necessary to function during the proceedings; and (vi) whether post-commencement finance receives priority over ordinary unse­cured creditors during distribution of assets.